thomas Posted October 4, 2021 Author Report Share Posted October 4, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted October 11, 2021 Author Report Share Posted October 11, 2021 omit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted October 21, 2021 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted November 2, 2021 Author Report Share Posted November 2, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Common Sense Posted November 2, 2021 Report Share Posted November 2, 2021 Why keep posting these meaningless numbers about this virus? There was never a pandemic. A Fauci-funded weapons-grade virus was produced and released on the world to help the deep state take its next steps in the hostile takeover of the country. Continuing to fixate on meaningless numbers from the numbskulls at the BC Health Department is simply playing along with their scam. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted November 2, 2021 Author Report Share Posted November 2, 2021 15 hours ago, Common Sense said: Why keep posting these meaningless numbers about this virus? There was never a pandemic. A Fauci-funded weapons-grade virus was produced and released on the world to help the deep state take its next steps in the hostile takeover of the country. Continuing to fixate on meaningless numbers from the numbskulls at the BC Health Department is simply playing along with their scam. I understand your Point Of View. But others have a different POV so I'll keep updating. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Common Sense Posted November 3, 2021 Report Share Posted November 3, 2021 15 hours ago, thomas said: I understand your Point Of View. But others have a different POV so I'll keep updating. Has it occurred to you that if there are others with a different POV who are interested in a meaningless jumble of numbers, they would actually go to the county's website to find the information themselves? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted November 3, 2021 Author Report Share Posted November 3, 2021 3 hours ago, Common Sense said: Has it occurred to you that if there are others with a different POV who are interested in a meaningless jumble of numbers, they would actually go to the county's website to find the information themselves? That may be true. This Forum offers an opportunity to comment and debate the numbers once posted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Common Sense Posted November 3, 2021 Report Share Posted November 3, 2021 56 minutes ago, thomas said: That may be true. This Forum offers an opportunity to comment and debate the numbers once posted. I don't know if you've noticed, but nobody is "debating" the numbers you're posting. I know from reading your posts, Thomas, that you and I are on the same side of this issue, and most others as far as I can tell. So, not to belabor the point, but continually posting these made up meaningless jumbles of numbers from the fear porn factory at the Broome County Health Department, with able assistance from the local talkers who fancy themselves "journalists" despite all evidence to the contrary, does nothing but stretch out the phony pandemic. This was never a pandemic. The health department and the local DNC stenographers in the media have never treated any other ailment like this - why no "dashboard" of influenza cases, common cold, RSV, cancer? Far more people are dying from the effects of poor eating habits and other lifestyle choices like drinking and smoking than are EVER going to die of COVID. Continuing to focus on a bunch of meaningless numbers for which there is no context provided actually helps the psychos in the government continue to pump out the fear porn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted November 14, 2021 Author Report Share Posted November 14, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted November 20, 2021 Author Report Share Posted November 20, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Common Sense Posted November 20, 2021 Report Share Posted November 20, 2021 Yep. Keep on posting those numbers Thomas. They are so meaningful. You are BC Voice's very own Kathy Whyte.https://www.globalresearch.ca/nucleic-acid-testing-technologies-use-polymerase-chain-reaction-pcr-detection-sars-cov-2/5739959 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksonx3 Posted November 20, 2021 Report Share Posted November 20, 2021 Amazing how consistent the sourcing is. Used to be that the guy in the sandwich board with the loony conspiracies was a pariah. Now they have a union. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Chossudovsky#Centre_for_Research_on_Globalization Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted November 20, 2021 Author Report Share Posted November 20, 2021 On 11/20/2021 at 10:20 AM, Common Sense said: Yep. Keep on posting those numbers Thomas. They are so meaningful. You are BC Voice's very own Kathy Whyte.https://www.globalresearch.ca/nucleic-acid-testing-technologies-use-polymerase-chain-reaction-pcr-detection-sars-cov-2/5739959 I'm just happy with the makeup. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bo Marsh Posted November 20, 2021 Report Share Posted November 20, 2021 I like seeing the info and am glad you are posting it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
27 Time World Champions Posted November 20, 2021 Report Share Posted November 20, 2021 2 hours ago, Bo Marsh said: I like seeing the info and am glad you are posting it. I second that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteMoss Posted November 20, 2021 Report Share Posted November 20, 2021 3 hours ago, Bo Marsh said: I like seeing the info and am glad you are posting it. I will third that. 6 hours ago, Common Sense said: Yep. Keep on posting those numbers Thomas. They are so meaningful. You are BC Voice's very own Kathy Whyte.https://www.globalresearch.ca/nucleic-acid-testing-technologies-use-polymerase-chain-reaction-pcr-detection-sars-cov-2/5739959 You don't have to read it. You are trying to be a control freak. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Common Sense Posted November 21, 2021 Report Share Posted November 21, 2021 15 hours ago, PeteMoss said: I will third that. You don't have to read it. You are trying to be a control freak. And now you are. A control freak trying to control the control freak. If anyone really needed to see meaningless county numbers on a phony pandemic, wouldn't they actually go to the county dashboard? Besides, as long as Kathy Whyte exists, there will always be plenty of fear porn to read and listen to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted December 1, 2021 Author Report Share Posted December 1, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted December 6, 2021 Author Report Share Posted December 6, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginger Posted December 7, 2021 Report Share Posted December 7, 2021 .015 % died I guess that matches up to the national average. But what about long term? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteMoss Posted December 9, 2021 Report Share Posted December 9, 2021 While 0.015% sounds small it isn't. If 0.015% of the time you drove your car you were killed, it would mean that you could only go out in your car 3,333 times before you were statistically killed. That is go to a place and then come home. That is less than 10 years and you would be dead. No one would be driving with those odds. Maybe I am looking at this wrong. Am I? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bingoloid Posted December 9, 2021 Report Share Posted December 9, 2021 1 hour ago, PeteMoss said: Maybe I am looking at this wrong. Am I? Yes. Ginger is off by two decimal places. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteMoss Posted December 9, 2021 Report Share Posted December 9, 2021 6 hours ago, Bingoloid said: Yes. Ginger is off by two decimal places. You are right. I didn't check the math. 437 / 29282 = 0.015 = 1.5% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanCooper Posted December 9, 2021 Report Share Posted December 9, 2021 11 hours ago, PeteMoss said: While 0.015% sounds small it isn't. If 0.015% of the time you drove your car you were killed, it would mean that you could only go out in your car 3,333 times before you were statistically killed. That is go to a place and then come home. That is less than 10 years and you would be dead. No one would be driving with those odds. Maybe I am looking at this wrong. Am I? Yes, but one’s health and personal choices for said health can impact the statistics. Look at it as a Bell curve. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.