Bingking Posted April 6, 2022 Report Share Posted April 6, 2022 I’m hearing rich David is mounting up a huge civil lawsuit on Miss. Jablon…. Hmmm we will see . Let’s just hope Rich goes easy on her lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginger Posted April 6, 2022 Report Share Posted April 6, 2022 4 hours ago, Bingking said: I’m hearing rich David is mounting up a huge civil lawsuit on Miss. Jablon…. Hmmm we will see . Let’s just hope Rich goes easy on her lol lol Did we NOT spend enough time discussing the Clean Hands Doctrine? Does Bing have to go over that again for us? and NO I'm not awake yet...3 sips of coffee isn't nearly enough. What's he going to say? I'm so great in bed, it's not my fault it drives women to do crazy things? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Misbehavin' Posted April 6, 2022 Report Share Posted April 6, 2022 Two adults had consenting sex. Emily has gone over and beyond overboard psychotic. She has continually disparaged him relentlessly with false allegations and threats. Ginger, are you saying that there is no case because they "may" have had sex which makes his case useless because of a Clean Hands Doctrine? I don't get it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bingking Posted April 6, 2022 Report Share Posted April 6, 2022 6 hours ago, Misbehavin' said: Two adults had consenting sex. Emily has gone over and beyond overboard psychotic. She has continually disparaged him relentlessly with false allegations and threats. Ginger, are you saying that there is no case because they "may" have had sex which makes his case useless because of a Clean Hands Doctrine? I don't get it. Anytime I comment Ginger always try’s to change the subject, its pathetic and quite frankly makes me wonder if Ginger is Emily or John Solak. Ginger is the same person who said Emily is a child and Ginger has said in the past on this thread that Ginger knows what Emily is thinking. Really it makes you wonder how someone like Ginger could know what another person is thinking. Also, Emily has posted on BCVoice assuming Ginger will post whatever she wants posted. Ginger has pushed many false claims that Ginger has not backed up anyways so don’t mind Ginger GINGER cannot change the fact that Rich David has a huge case against Emily Jablon for defamation and slander AND many other things. Let’s just hope Rich David goes easy on Emily because I’ve been hearing that he’s going to sue Emily and it’s going to be really bad. Emily Jablon’s Wages Will be garnished for the rest of her life with the mounting case I’m hearing rich David has against Emily lololol She has nobody in court but her self whether it’s fake accounts like Betsey Johnson or page 607 Mike Korchak is having his way Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginger Posted April 6, 2022 Report Share Posted April 6, 2022 6 hours ago, Misbehavin' said: Two adults had consenting sex. Emily has gone over and beyond overboard psychotic. She has continually disparaged him relentlessly with false allegations and threats. Ginger, are you saying that there is no case because they "may" have had sex which makes his case useless because of a Clean Hands Doctrine? I don't get it. I saw your post before I started for home..I'm about 2 hours out. I wanted to make sure I was giving you a serious answer and not be haphazard about it. Everything I thought of sounded trite and eventually I asked myself, What would Jack say right now? Begin with the end in mind. What would it take to restore Mayor David's good name and reputation? I have a number. I'm not going to tell you what that is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Factchecker Posted April 6, 2022 Report Share Posted April 6, 2022 2 hours ago, ginger said: I saw your post before I started for home..I'm about 2 hours out. I wanted to make sure I was giving you a serious answer and not be haphazard about it. Everything I thought of sounded trite and eventually I asked myself, What would Jack say right now? Begin with the end in mind. What would it take to restore Mayor David's good name and reputation? I have a number. I'm not going to tell you what that is. John, Emily is the one who needs her name and reputation restored. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginger Posted April 6, 2022 Report Share Posted April 6, 2022 7 hours ago, Bingking said: Anytime I comment Ginger always try’s to change the subject, its pathetic and quite frankly makes me wonder if Ginger is Emily or John Solak. Ginger is the same person who said Emily is a child and Ginger has said in the past on this thread that Ginger knows what Emily is thinking. Really it makes you wonder how someone like Ginger could know what another person is thinking. Also, Emily has posted on BCVoice assuming Ginger will post whatever she wants posted. Ginger has pushed many false claims that Ginger has not backed up anyways so don’t mind Ginger GINGER cannot change the fact that Rich David has a huge case against Emily Jablon for defamation and slander AND many other things. Let’s just hope Rich David goes easy on Emily because I’ve been hearing that he’s going to sue Emily and it’s going to be really bad. Emily Jablon’s Wages Will be garnished for the rest of her life with the mounting case I’m hearing rich David has against Emily lololol She has nobody in court but her self whether it’s fake accounts like Betsey Johnson or page 607 Mike Korchak is having his way Have you ever heard the word "empathy"? It means placing yourself in someone else's position. Geez, I just put myself in a fictional characters position (Jack McCoy) and drew on that. It's my understanding the goal of a defamation lawsuit is to restore their reputation. Make them whole again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Factchecker Posted April 6, 2022 Report Share Posted April 6, 2022 34 minutes ago, ginger said: Have you ever heard the word "empathy"? It means placing yourself in someone else's position. Geez, I just put myself in a fictional characters position (Jack McCoy) and drew on that. It's my understanding the goal of a defamation lawsuit is to restore their reputation. Make them whole again? John I cannot put myself in a position where I commit crimes and make up lies in an attempt to damage people’s reputations and careers in an attempt to extort money. Jack McCoy would lock that POS up and throw away the key! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bingking Posted April 6, 2022 Report Share Posted April 6, 2022 18 minutes ago, Factchecker said: John I cannot put myself in a position where I commit crimes and make up lies in an attempt to damage people’s reputations and careers in an attempt to extort money. Jack McCoy would lock that POS up and throw away the key! At one point in time John had credibility and people actually looked At him for the news that our local media wouldn’t report on. it’s pretty sad at the lengths he will go whenever A bad post about his female friend with zero credibility shows up he is all over it. Maybe rich david will give him a shout out in this big litigation case he’s about to bring on Emily from what I heard but I don’t think it’s the shout out he’s going to be interested in lol rich already contacted locals website where John’s blog website running under and was able to get Emily from commenting about him Fromm John’s website from what I heard, you never know how far Rich will take it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginger Posted April 6, 2022 Report Share Posted April 6, 2022 (edited) Lolololol 🙂...I can't sleep. Scratch the one I deleted. I'll find a better idea. Edited April 6, 2022 by ginger Not good enough Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bingking Posted April 7, 2022 Report Share Posted April 7, 2022 15 hours ago, Factchecker said: John I cannot put myself in a position where I commit crimes and make up lies in an attempt to damage people’s reputations and careers in an attempt to extort money. Jack McCoy would lock that POS up and throw away the key! You are right FC, someone is playing nanny. Don’t cry lol. Its too late if someone took the advice of Judge Fischer BinghamtonDaily@BinghamtonDaily 14 hours ago Rich David will never sue Emily Jablon for anything. Silly boy, huff and puffer, NYS Senate candidate Richard “the Claude” David is circulating rumors that he intends to sue his sex partner Emily Jablon for defamation. To say this is a non-starter is being kind. As Judge Bob Fischer once told me that if you threaten to sue someone, the complaint and process service should go out that day. Rich David should man-up (that may be impossible) because of his predilections, so at least half-man up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
92CorruptCourtStreet Posted April 7, 2022 Author Report Share Posted April 7, 2022 On 4/5/2022 at 8:08 PM, Bingking said: I’m hearing rich David is mounting up a huge civil lawsuit on Miss. Jablon…. Hmmm we will see . Let’s just hope Rich goes easy on her lol I heard that floating around tooo. Maybe he will depose John to the stand lol will he risk it all for Emily? Knowing Big bad Rich he may bring in the big time lawyers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginger Posted April 7, 2022 Report Share Posted April 7, 2022 23 hours ago, ginger said: Lolololol 🙂...I can't sleep. Scratch the one I deleted. I'll find a better idea. Don't mind me, just taking notes... The words have to be capable of being defamatory. Well..this looks interesting. ORIGINS IN PUBLIC FIGURE DOCTRINE in FIRST AMMENDMENT DEFAMATION LAW. 65 pages of it. Have a cozy rainy night.. 🙂 Oh wow, I totally forgot about the "newsworthiness" thing..I remember when, I think it was Lynn Wood couldn't get a case against James Comey to be heard because time passed and it wasn't newsworthy anymore. Then again, didn't I say that several pages ago? On this thread? Time has passed, it's a nonstarter? A coward, drunkard, liar, hypocrite, scoundrel,crook, scandal monger, anarchist, skunk, bastard, eunuch, rotten egg, being unfair to labor, doing a thing oppressive, dishonorable or heartless.. pg 88.. footnote 27. Liability will exist for giving publicity to things the communitys customs and ordinary views finds offensive. Therefore, there is no liability if you can prove Broome County Voters don't get offended easily? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginger Posted April 8, 2022 Report Share Posted April 8, 2022 Grrrr.. so Harlan asks How hardened are public officials to offensive publicity? Wouldn't they be equally hardened as the voters who put them there? Or, as Jill Biden so famously noted, "You'll just have to hold your nose and vote for Joe."? Will it be the plaintiffs argument that the desirability of the candidate has been lost by this scandal? (Thus, interfering with the political process?) Just asking because it looks like if the candidates affairs were already public knowledge there is no privilege. Footnote...This is not easy reading. I'm not even through the first ten pages. The footnotes are killing me but obviously I have to read them and look up the references. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginger Posted April 8, 2022 Report Share Posted April 8, 2022 On 4/6/2022 at 5:23 PM, Factchecker said: John I cannot put myself in a position where I commit crimes and make up lies in an attempt to damage people’s reputations and careers in an attempt to extort money. Jack McCoy would lock that POS up and throw away the key! The candidate has a history of being associated with scandal. It's been in the newspaper and there are police records. AND WE STILL VOTED FOR HIM ANYWAY! TWICE! There is no terroristic disruption of political process. Post edit.. How about that time he tried to get Daisy? Something fired from her job at the TV station? He tried to damage her reputation and career? Gee, no correlation there? I bet her lawyer doesn't even remember that. I bet Korchak doesn't either. Wasn't there a lawsuit? Hasn't he been sued a couple of times? How clean hands does NOT enter into this case at all is beyond my sensibilities. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginger Posted April 8, 2022 Report Share Posted April 8, 2022 29 minutes ago, ginger said: The candidate has a history of being associated with scandal. It's been in the newspaper and there are police records. AND WE STILL VOTED FOR HIM ANYWAY! TWICE! There is no terroristic disruption of political process. Post edit.. How about that time he tried to get Daisy? Something fired from her job at the TV station? He tried to damage her reputation and career? Gee, no correlation there? I bet her lawyer doesn't even remember that. I bet Korchak doesn't either. Wasn't there a lawsuit? Hasn't he been sued a couple of times? How clean hands does NOT enter into this case at all is beyond my sensibilities. Oh it's all coming back to me now...the consensus was HIS GIRLFRIEND MADE HIM DO IT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
92CorruptCourtStreet Posted April 8, 2022 Author Report Share Posted April 8, 2022 Sorry Ginger your crew cleanup on aisle Emily jablon is not working well. my friends told me Rich David & Co have done their homework on this young lady and it’s not looking good …. Their is a big birthday present lol defamation defamation defamation !!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginger Posted April 8, 2022 Report Share Posted April 8, 2022 19 minutes ago, 92CorruptCourtStreet said: Sorry Ginger your crew cleanup on aisle Emily jablon is not working well. my friends told me Rich David & Co have done their homework on this young lady and it’s not looking good …. Their is a big birthday present lol defamation defamation defamation !!!!!!! Lol sweetheart...this is Shakespeare on steroids to me. Take a pound of flesh but not one drop of blood. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Factchecker Posted April 9, 2022 Report Share Posted April 9, 2022 13 hours ago, ginger said: Lol sweetheart...this is Shakespeare on steroids to me. Take a pound of flesh but not one drop of blood. Do you really think people will forget that Emily is a criminal who has lied and tried to extort people and damage their reputations? Here’s the only fact that matters. Only one person is facing criminal charges and it’s Emily who was arrested four times at last count for felony and misdemeanor crimes. Try to rewrite history all you want but those facts won’t change. Nor will the fact that her own mother, Pornbeck and David have or had orders of protection against her. What Emily has done to her own parents is disgusting but by all means keep trying to enable her for your own sick entertainment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
92CorruptCourtStreet Posted April 9, 2022 Author Report Share Posted April 9, 2022 1 hour ago, Factchecker said: Do you really think people will forget that Emily is a criminal who has lied and tried to extort people and damage their reputations? Here’s the only fact that matters. Only one person is facing criminal charges and it’s Emily who was arrested four times at last count for felony and misdemeanor crimes. Try to rewrite history all you want but those facts won’t change. Nor will the fact that her own mother, Pornbeck and David have or had orders of protection against her. What Emily has done to her own parents is disgusting but by all means keep trying to enable her for your own sick entertainment. Exactly, and let’s not forget every day for most of the past year she was posting the names of the county executives and his assistant and the district attorney‘s wife slandering them accusing them as well as the mayor threatening to kill him. and yet there was only one person that was arrested multiple times for heinous crimes and her name is Emily Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Factchecker Posted April 9, 2022 Report Share Posted April 9, 2022 13 minutes ago, 92CorruptCourtStreet said: Exactly, and let’s not forget every day for most of the past year she was posting the names of the county executives and his assistant and the district attorney‘s wife slandering them accusing them as well as the mayor threatening to kill him. and yet there was only one person that was arrested multiple times for heinous crimes and her name is Emily Excellent point! People will not forget that either! Let’s see how they try to change the subject again! Maybe slimy John will dig up something on David from elementary school or maybe David got detention in high school and we can focus on that! If it weren’t for elected officials I wonder who john would focus all his time on? There’s always Garnar’s antics to fall back on but that’s been beaten to death as well... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
92CorruptCourtStreet Posted April 9, 2022 Author Report Share Posted April 9, 2022 1 hour ago, Factchecker said: Excellent point! People will not forget that either! Let’s see how they try to change the subject again! Maybe slimy John will dig up something on David from elementary school or maybe David got detention in high school and we can focus on that! If it weren’t for elected officials I wonder who john would focus all his time on? There’s always Garnar’s antics to fall back on but that’s been beaten to death as well... Lol sooo true I wouldn’t put it past him on “binghamton daily locals”, or maybe John will post an article with a photo of David again about how he wore a red jacket. That happened before and john tried to make the claim David was some sort of outcast Great Journalism work John!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginger Posted April 9, 2022 Report Share Posted April 9, 2022 4 hours ago, Factchecker said: Do you really think people will forget that Emily is a criminal who has lied and tried to extort people and damage their reputations? Here’s the only fact that matters. Only one person is facing criminal charges and it’s Emily who was arrested four times at last count for felony and misdemeanor crimes. Try to rewrite history all you want but those facts won’t change. Nor will the fact that her own mother, Pornbeck and David have or had orders of protection against her. What Emily has done to her own parents is disgusting but by all means keep trying to enable her for your own sick entertainment. My entertainment...sticking up for women? Emily is not the first person I've tried to support when I can. It bothers me when women are exclusively bashed but the men get treated like they have zero complicity. None whatsoever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
92CorruptCourtStreet Posted April 9, 2022 Author Report Share Posted April 9, 2022 1 hour ago, ginger said: It bothers me when women are exclusively bashed but the men get treated like they have zero complicity. None whatsoever. Not true, I’ve heard Mike korchak’s office could of charged Emily with many more severe crimes than she has been charged with. To say Korchak and assistant DA Finley have gone hard on her is hogwash Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginger Posted April 9, 2022 Report Share Posted April 9, 2022 1 hour ago, 92CorruptCourtStreet said: Not true, I’ve heard Mike korchak’s office could of charged Emily with many more severe crimes than she has been charged with. To say Korchak and assistant DA Finley have gone hard on her is hogwash Funny when I first heard the terrorist charge I thought he weaponized the law against her. Then again, I'm still only on page 10 of 65 of Origins so what do I know? 🙂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.