Guest A Reasonable Atheist Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 I don't suppose I need to go to far into this problem this evening. As usual, the capitalist class, represented by high-risk investment bank Bear Stearns, has run out of room to exploit the market. They are failing from their own incompetence. Firms such as Bear Stearns routinely opposed regulation of their practices, but now demand a bail out from the Federal Reserve Bank. Perhaps the government can give a bailout to the millions of people facing massive debt and foreclosure. No, instead years ago the government passed a bankruptcy bill making it very difficult for an ordinary American to declare bankruptcy, a process that innumerable corporations engage in every year to avoid paying their debts. It seems that what is good for the goose is no longer good for the gander. This is just another example of the failures of laissez-faire capitalism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alan greenspan Posted March 18, 2008 Report Share Posted March 18, 2008 I don't suppose I need to go to far into this problem this evening. As usual, the capitalist class, represented by high-risk investment bank Bear Stearns, has run out of room to exploit the market. They are failing from their own incompetence. Firms such as Bear Stearns routinely opposed regulation of their practices, but now demand a bail out from the Federal Reserve Bank. Perhaps the government can give a bailout to the millions of people facing massive debt and foreclosure. No, instead years ago the government passed a bankruptcy bill making it very difficult for an ordinary American to declare bankruptcy, a process that innumerable corporations engage in every year to avoid paying their debts. It seems that what is good for the goose is no longer good for the gander. This is just another example of the failures of laissez-faire capitalism. BINGO. anyone that thinks we live in a capitalistic system is brain dead. this is like the savings and loan scandal when all the poor people paid to bail out a bunch of well connected thieves, like GWB'S brother. i get a kick out of the the idiot's on here bashing socialists. YOU ARE ONE. you're just too dumb to know it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 18, 2008 Report Share Posted March 18, 2008 Victims of Katrina are still without a home but let's bail out the rich predatory lenders. The loan sharks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 18, 2008 Report Share Posted March 18, 2008 Victims of Katrina are still without a home but let's bail out the rich predatory lenders. The loan sharks. So let em sink then where do you think that will leave your boss and your job? and yours, and yours and yours, and your brother in north carolina and yours, and your sister in indiana. Getting the picture of course not. Go ahead root for them to fail dunce. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aphoristically Moderate Posted March 18, 2008 Report Share Posted March 18, 2008 I watched MSNBC's Larry Kudlow talking to a bunch of economists this evening. They do admit the hypocrisy of Letting JP Morgan buy out its rival, Bear Stearns and the hypocrisy of the Federal Reserve lending $30 billion (of our money) to the deal, to keep things solvent. It was a sort of "It's too big to fail" situation where other, smaller banks would stop lending money to responsible borrowers if panic spread. It was also discussed that Bear Stearns was made as an example, to show other banks that another institution would be allowed to by them up at only $2 per share if they behaved the same way in the future. However, I also don't have too much sympathy for people who voluntarily decided to live 9 feet below sea level. For years before Katrina, Louisiana received millions in Army Corps of Engineering funds to prevent what happened. "Before Katrina, the Corps was spending more in Louisiana than in any other state, but much of it was going to wasteful and destructive pork instead of protection for New Orleans." http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/art...1648904,00.html By the time we're done bailing out coastal Louisiana, it may cost us $300 billion. For that kind of money, we would be better off just relocating everybody. http://www.cagw.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=9316 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 18, 2008 Report Share Posted March 18, 2008 So let em sink then where do you think that will leave your boss and your job? and yours, and yours and yours, and your brother in north carolina and yours, and your sister in indiana. Getting the picture of course not. Go ahead root for them to fail dunce. Learn how to read please. No one was rooting for them to fail. What's being objected to is the lack of consequences for them when they DO fail. Dolt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 18, 2008 Report Share Posted March 18, 2008 Learn how to read please. No one was rooting for them to fail. What's being objected to is the lack of consequences for them when they DO fail. Dolt. You call me a dolt???? Lack of consequences???? That is laughable let's just start with the fact that those that are the much hated white collar end of that banking company you know the rich ones are looking for work today more than likely. Not to mention that their stock fell from approx: 69.00 a share feb,28th to 2 dollars a share on march 17th. So I would say there is more consequences involved in this one failure than you or all your friends will see in your lifetime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alan greenspan Posted March 18, 2008 Report Share Posted March 18, 2008 So let em sink then where do you think that will leave your boss and your job? and yours, and yours and yours, and your brother in north carolina and yours, and your sister in indiana. Getting the picture of course not. Go ahead root for them to fail dunce. nominee: dumbest post ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alan greenspan Posted March 18, 2008 Report Share Posted March 18, 2008 I watched MSNBC's Larry Kudlow talking to a bunch of economists this evening. They do admit the hypocrisy of Letting JP Morgan buy out its rival, Bear Stearns and the hypocrisy of the Federal Reserve lending $30 billion (of our money) to the deal, to keep things solvent. It was a sort of "It's too big to fail" situation where other, smaller banks would stop lending money to responsible borrowers if panic spread. It was also discussed that Bear Stearns was made as an example, to show other banks that another institution would be allowed to by them up at only $2 per share if they behaved the same way in the future. However, I also don't have too much sympathy for people who voluntarily decided to live 9 feet below sea level. For years before Katrina, Louisiana received millions in Army Corps of Engineering funds to prevent what happened. "Before Katrina, the Corps was spending more in Louisiana than in any other state, but much of it was going to wasteful and destructive pork instead of protection for New Orleans." http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/art...1648904,00.html By the time we're done bailing out coastal Louisiana, it may cost us $300 billion. For that kind of money, we would be better off just relocating everybody. http://www.cagw.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=9316 the federal reserve is a privatley owned bank. it loans money to entities all over the world, including the US GOV'T. everyone pays interest. i don't see how the 30 billion could be our money, unless the procedure they are calling for somehow has the fed and gov't working together, thereby making it tax dollars. we would have to borrow it as a country. also, does anyone know if the fed was involved with savings and loan collapse, because i know taxpayer money paid that bill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest A Reasonable Atheist Posted March 18, 2008 Report Share Posted March 18, 2008 the federal reserve is a privatley owned bank. it loans money to entities all over the world, including the US GOV'T. everyone pays interest. i don't see how the 30 billion could be our money, unless the procedure they are calling for somehow has the fed and gov't working together, thereby making it tax dollars. we would have to borrow it as a country. also, does anyone know if the fed was involved with savings and loan collapse, because i know taxpayer money paid that bill. Actually, the Fed is a quasi-public entity, part private part public, with a Board of Governors appointed by the President. So, yes, its mostly our money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aphoristically Moderate Posted March 18, 2008 Report Share Posted March 18, 2008 My stock portfolio consists mostly of stock mutual funds, but I do own a couple of NYSE traded stocks. One is Walter Industries, a coal mining company, ticker symbol WLT. Over the last 6 months, I would say that capitalism has not failed me. http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?t=1y&s=W...=&c=%5EGSPC The red is the S&P500, the blue is WLT. I also own several hundred shares of Potash Saskatchewan, a fertilizer company, ticker POT. Again, capitalism is doing okay for me. http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?t=1y&s=P...=&c=%5EGSPC Red is S&P, blue is POT. Last October, one bcvoicer said they just bought Indevus Pharmaceuticals, ticker IDEV. Capitalism is probably failing him right now. http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?t=1y&s=I...=&c=%5EGSPC Scott Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest A Reasonable Atheist Posted March 19, 2008 Report Share Posted March 19, 2008 My stock portfolio consists mostly of stock mutual funds, but I do own a couple of NYSE traded stocks. One is Walter Industries, a coal mining company, ticker symbol WLT. Over the last 6 months, I would say that capitalism has not failed me. http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?t=1y&s=W...=&c=%5EGSPC The red is the S&P500, the blue is WLT. I also own several hundred shares of Potash Saskatchewan, a fertilizer company, ticker POT. Again, capitalism is doing okay for me. http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?t=1y&s=P...=&c=%5EGSPC Red is S&P, blue is POT. Last October, one bcvoicer said they just bought Indevus Pharmaceuticals, ticker IDEV. Capitalism is probably failing him right now. http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?t=1y&s=I...=&c=%5EGSPC Scott I was referring to specific capitalists who run high-risk investment banks, oppose regulation, then demand bailouts. It must be nice to have money to invest, unlike most of this nation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 19, 2008 Report Share Posted March 19, 2008 I was referring to specific capitalists who run high-risk investment banks, oppose regulation, then demand bailouts. It must be nice to have money to invest, unlike most of this nation. And there you have it...class warfare being waged by another jealous loser who blames everyone else for his statiion in life. Most of this nation could have money to invest if they were smart and weren't consumed by instant gratification and mass stupidity. @ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom Posted March 20, 2008 Report Share Posted March 20, 2008 My stock portfolio consists mostly of stock mutual funds, but I do own a couple of NYSE traded stocks. One is Walter Industries, a coal mining company, ticker symbol WLT. Over the last 6 months, I would say that capitalism has not failed me. http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?t=1y&s=W...=&c=%5EGSPC The red is the S&P500, the blue is WLT. I also own several hundred shares of Potash Saskatchewan, a fertilizer company, ticker POT. Again, capitalism is doing okay for me. http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?t=1y&s=P...=&c=%5EGSPC Red is S&P, blue is POT. Last October, one bcvoicer said they just bought Indevus Pharmaceuticals, ticker IDEV. Capitalism is probably failing him right now. http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?t=1y&s=I...=&c=%5EGSPC Scott I hope you sold WLT today at about the 5ma and secured your profit. @ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aphoristically Moderate Posted March 20, 2008 Report Share Posted March 20, 2008 I don't think I will sell it just because of the volatility from today. Information cited here can go out of date really quick, but as I write this, I can see that WLT is just about where it was 5 days ago.... about $55 per share. The coal mining sector has a lot of money in it right now. Other good sectors to look in are non-metallic mining, gold &silver, crops, fish & livestock, iron & steel, and chemical manufacturing. Of the coal mining sector, WLT still looks like it has the best promise for some long term gains. Other coal companies that rise to the top are Massey Energy (MEE), Foundation Coal Holdings (FCL), Alliance Holdings (AHGP), and Peabody Energy (BTU). Walter Industries seems to be the only one with the stock price moving generally higher for the last 6 months. http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?t=1y&s=W...=&c=%5EGSPC The following graph still says it's neither overbought nor oversold in relation to its recent price action. http://research.scottrade.com/public/stock....asp?symbol=WLT I don't look at this stuff everyday, and I have some software that I paid for to look at it a little simpler. However, this free Scottrade software says it pretty good too. Scottrade does say it has moved below its 13 day, moving average line, so maybe it's having a "weak bearish signal." I've seen this before. I'll just keep an eye on it for now. Scott Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JMK Posted March 20, 2008 Report Share Posted March 20, 2008 Some people get rich in any market. It's gambling, you have to be lucky. The point is, the federal government is stepping in to protect the gamblers from the risk they are taking, using our tax money. That is after reducing the capita; gains tax. Huge war debt Devalued dollar Housing bubble Record levels of consumer credit Huge trade unbalance Four or five dollar gas Wealth based on financial manipulation rather than adding value to a product Not to worry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Henry K Posted March 20, 2008 Report Share Posted March 20, 2008 I forgot Real wages are less than they were a year ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.