Guest another guest Posted April 11, 2008 Report Share Posted April 11, 2008 Correct me on this one if I am wrong -I know several people who work part time for local districts and they say that the major reason the districts keep them part time is to avoid paying benefits-retirement and health. They make anywhere from $ 8-11/ hour. So now districts claim its OK to pay a big retainer to lawyers who work for them VERY part time, AND pay their benefits as well? I hope our attorney general names names on this one, especially the local districts and attorneys involved, as well as any administrator who approved this. Talk about padding your pension-can this be legal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest lawyer c Posted April 11, 2008 Report Share Posted April 11, 2008 Correct me on this one if I am wrong -I know several people who work part time for local districts and they say that the major reason the districts keep them part time is to avoid paying benefits-retirement and health. They make anywhere from $ 8-11/ hour. So now districts claim its OK to pay a big retainer to lawyers who work for them VERY part time, AND pay their benefits as well? I hope our attorney general names names on this one, especially the local districts and attorneys involved, as well as any administrator who approved this. Talk about padding your pension-can this be legal? You are sooo wrong... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cyberdog Posted April 11, 2008 Report Share Posted April 11, 2008 This is Cuomo trying to make a big splash. He saw how Spitzer made a name for himself as a crusading AG and nows wants to do the same. It may be bad policy to allow attys to get benies for P-T work, but it doesn't seem to have violated any law. It seems to be a matter of the school districts negotiating better contracts. Or for the state to step in and regulate the practice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALREDEGONE Posted April 11, 2008 Report Share Posted April 11, 2008 I would be very interested to know what attorneys the Johnson City School District employ and whether or not they have connections to anyone on the school board ?!?!? @ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted April 11, 2008 Report Share Posted April 11, 2008 I would be very interested to know what attorneys the Johnson City School District employ and whether or not they have connections to anyone on the school board ?!?!? @ There is something going on that is ripping off the taxpayers yet again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted April 11, 2008 Report Share Posted April 11, 2008 Correct me on this one if I am wrong -I know several people who work part time for local districts and they say that the major reason the districts keep them part time is to avoid paying benefits-retirement and health. They make anywhere from $ 8-11/ hour. So now districts claim its OK to pay a big retainer to lawyers who work for them VERY part time, AND pay their benefits as well? I hope our attorney general names names on this one, especially the local districts and attorneys involved, as well as any administrator who approved this. Talk about padding your pension-can this be legal? I would like to answer, but I have to get back to scool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted April 11, 2008 Report Share Posted April 11, 2008 H, S ....... up on Carpathian owow owow @ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.