Continuity Czar Posted March 7, 2008 Report Share Posted March 7, 2008 Trump: Thank you so much for the reafferming comment. I thought long and hard before I considered submitting it. I sent it to the P & S for print this week and will send it to the other four daily papers today. Tax&Spend: While the act of the breech may be civil, I would assume the abbetting is criminal. I also COMPLETELY agree about bringing someone down and would never attack Mr. Hinchey's personal choices, but this is a big deal and points straight to character. I am not going to harp on it; after this weekend I will most likely not mention it again, but at this moment, it is a hot news item and I would be remiss if I did nothing. Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Continuity Czar Posted March 7, 2008 Report Share Posted March 7, 2008 "I couldn't have come up with a list like you did regarding Hinchey's record. It is time for him to be unemployed. Unfortunetely, even if he is voted out, he will still receive around a hundred grand a year in pension. That's why i want him impeached - if he is, he might not be elligable for the pension. " If you're running for congress, please learn how to spell "eligible." Thanks! AND YOU ARE WHO? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tax&Spend Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 . . . . While the act of the breach may be civil, I would assume the abbetting is criminal. . . . I don't think so, and you know what happens when we "ASSUME". Aiding/abbetting some non-criminal civil breach of contract would seem to be merely another civil matter. You are correct, however, that this "points straight to character". But, if the majority can be persuaded to "change the rules" 2/3rds of the way through "the game", then this remains an internal issue for the Democratic Party that may say the Dems can't be trusted to see a once-agreed-upon process through to conclusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Continuity Czar Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 I don't think so, and you know what happens when we "ASSUME". Aiding/abbetting some non-criminal civil breach of contract would seem to be merely another civil matter. You are correct, however, that this "points straight to character". But, if the majority can be persuaded to "change the rules" 2/3rds of the way through "the game", then this remains an internal issue for the Democratic Party that may say the Dems can't be trusted to see a once-agreed-upon process through to conclusion. I will look into that - the last thing I would want to do is waste taxpayer money. However, the character issue may play out this season. I am also looking into his activities regarding something called The Logan Act. This was forwarded to me by a fellow Constitutionalist and I want to know more about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 I was asking about opinions regarding Hinchey's impeachable actions. Do you agree with them or not? As for any comments regarding own my campaign, I will not respond to anyone who is not logged in and is unwilling to identify himself or herself. So you only respond to voters who identify themselves? WOW! Now that is a campaign headed for success! That and the fact you campaign on here, insures that you wont even come close to victory in this race. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 Almost every time a Hinchey thread comes up, there is an anonymous poster who says, 'I like Hinchey, I will continue to vote for him.' There is no specificity to this. This person must either be a Trial Lawyer, on some government entitlement, or an illegal alien because that's who Hinchey represents best. http://www.issues2000.org/NY/Maurice_Hinch...meland_Security Maurice Hinchey has a terrible record when it comes to representing the average 22nd district citizen. He has voted NO on the grizzly practice of partial birth abortion. He has voted NO on making it a crime to harm an unborn baby, while committing another crime. He has voted NO on forbidding human cloning. He has a 100% approval from NARAL, the National Abortion Rights Action League. He has voted NO on protecting the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. He has voted NO on an Amendment protecting the American Flag from desecration. He has voted NO for more prosecutions of more juvenile crime. He has supported the concept of "Hate Crimes" where punishments are allocated based on thoughts. He has voted NO on more funding for Border Patrols to battle drugs and terrorism. He has voted NO on prohibiting needle exchanges. He has voted NO on subjecting federal employees to random drug tests. He has voted NO on permitting new oil refinery permits. He has voted NO on new oil refinery construction. He has voted YES on maintaining a moratorium on new offshore drilling. He has voted NO on drilling in ANWAR. He has voted YES on removing oil and gas exploration subsidies. He believes in more government control of electricity and gas prices. He has voted YES on declaring OPEC a criminal organization. He has voted YES on forbidding using the Yucca mountains for nuclear waste. He has voted NO on reducing the Marriage Tax. He has voted NO on deterring foreign arms transfers to China. He has voted NO on restricting funding the United Nations. He has voted NO on withholding $244 million to the UN until the US seat is restored. He voted YES on giving the IMF, the International Monetary Fund, $156 million for third world debt reduction. He has voted NO on free trade agreements with Peru, Central America, Australia, Singapore and Chile. He has voted NO on requiring voter ID when voting in federal elections. He has voted NO when restricting Trial Lawyer fees in class action lawsuits. He has voted NO on restricting frivolous lawsuits. He voted NO on prohibiting obesity lawsuits against food providers. He voted NO on prohibiting misuse lawsuits against gun manufacturers. He voted yes to expanding the SCHIP program, including to illegal aliens. He has voted NO on limiting malpractice lawsuits. He voted NO to allow small business associations to buy health insurance. He voted NO on allowing tax-exempt medical savings accounts. He voted NO on setting time limits on medical lawsuits. He voted NO on military recruitment on college campuses. He voted NO on establishing a Border Fence between the US and Mexico. He voted NO on tipping off illegal aliens about the Minuteman Project. He voted NO about reporting illegal aliens who receive medical treatment. He voted NO for more immigrant visas for SKILLED workers. He voted NO for offshore tax breaks and to promote small businesses. He voted NO on raising 401K limits and for making pension plans more portable. He voted NO on reducing taxes on Social Security benefits. He voted NO on lower tax rates for dividends and capital gains. He voted NO on making permanent the increase in the Child Tax Credit. He voted NO on permanently eliminating the Marriage Penalty. He voted NO on the Bush tax cuts and on making them permanent. He voted NO for tax cuts for small businesses. He is rated 25% by the National Taxpayers Union, indicating that he is a big spender on tax votes. He voted YES on a precipitous withdrawal from Iraq within 90 days, last May. He has voted NO for treating religious organizations equally for tax breaks. He voted NO for promoting the concept of "work" and "marriage" for TANF recipients. (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families) Scott Ssaund9084@aol.com Nope, I am not a trial lawyer. I am simply someone who believes he does a good job representing us. Oh, and by the way, nost people in this congressional district agree with me, and do not agree with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 I couldn't have come up with a list like you did regarding Hinchey's record. It is time for him to be unemployed. Unfortunetely, even if he is voted out, he will still receive around a hundred grand a year in pension. That's why i want him impeached - if he is, he might not be elligable for the pension. You are one whacked out dude! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 AND YOU ARE WHO? Someone who thinks you should learn how to spell before running for congress. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Continuity Czar Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 So you only respond to voters who identify themselves? WOW! Now that is a campaign headed for success! That and the fact you campaign on here, insures that you wont even come close to victory in this race. Basically, if a person is too lazy to even log in (or too much of a coward) then I am sure they don't bother voting and I don't really worry about their opinion. Be an adult and identify yourself rather than hiding in your mom's basement. As for spelling, if someone is going to judge a candidate on a typo, DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED or in other words - it's time to get a life. A candidate should be judged on his actions and believes, not how fast he types or whether or not he accidentally leaves out an "L". Normally, I would sign this "respectfully yours" but that doesn't apply here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 Basically, if a person is too lazy to even log in (or too much of a coward) then I am sure they don't bother voting and I don't really worry about their opinion. Be an adult and identify yourself rather than hiding in your mom's basement. As for spelling, if someone is going to judge a candidate on a typo, DELETED DELETED DELETED DELETED or in other words - it's time to get a life. A candidate should be judged on his actions and believes, not how fast he types or whether or not he accidentally leaves out an "L". Normally, I would sign this "respectfully yours" but that doesn't apply here. Insulting your voters is always a good way to secure their respect, trust and their vote. Keep up the good work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 Nope, I am not a trial lawyer. I am simply someone who believes he does a good job representing us. Oh, and by the way, nost people in this congressional district agree with me, and do not agree with you. Only a socialist would like Hinchey and I despise socialists. Divid, you have my vote and I will encourage everyone I know to vote you in. If you could possibly get that creep impeached, I think you should do so. Also if it costs taxpayer money to do this, you should proceed with it anyway. Most of our taxes are wasted by this group of dirtbags anyway and if you lose, I consider it money well spent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Continuity Czar Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 Insulting your voters is always a good way to secure their respect, trust and their vote. Keep up the good work. Again, not insulting a voter - talking so a troll can understand me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 Again, not insulting a voter - talking so a troll can understand me. yea - calling someone "lazy" a "coward" - telling them you "don't care about their opinions" - tell them they post "from their mommas basement" telling them to 'get a life" - telling them you have no respect for them - that is not insulting them. yep - all signs of a winning campaign. you and your campaign show yourself as a joke more by the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 Only a socialist would like Hinchey and I despise socialists. Divid, you have my vote and I will encourage everyone I know to vote you in. If you could possibly get that creep impeached, I think you should do so. Also if it costs taxpayer money to do this, you should proceed with it anyway. Most of our taxes are wasted by this group of dirtbags anyway and if you lose, I consider it money well spent. I checked - and there are less than 100 socialists registered in Broome County - yet he got tens of thousands of votes. How could that be, if only socialists like him tom? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Continuity Czar Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 yea - calling someone "lazy" a "coward" - telling them you "don't care about their opinions" - tell them they post "from their mommas basement" telling them to 'get a life" - telling them you have no respect for them - that is not insulting them. yep - all signs of a winning campaign. you and your campaign show yourself as a joke more by the day. Cool - thank you for your support. I wish you luck in your future at McDonalds (if you pass the BOCES class). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 Cool - thank you for your support. I wish you luck in your future at McDonalds (if you pass the BOCES class). Yep - more insulting of your voters always the way to go to win elections. by the way - i own three of my own buisnesses - doing over three million dollars a year in revenue. Happen to have a masters in business. Your candidacy is laughable at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Continuity Czar Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 I checked - and there are less than 100 socialists registered in Broome County - yet he got tens of thousands of votes. How could that be, if only socialists like him tom? The problem is more his socialist agenda rather than his being a socialist. A true socialist would identify himself as such; a coward would remain anonymous or act as a Democrat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NY Patriot Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 Cool - thank you for your support. I wish you luck in your future at McDonalds (if you pass the BOCES class). And your running for congress? You've lost any election from your posts here. You definately show immaturity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Continuity Czar Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 Yep - more insulting of your voters always the way to go to win elections. by the way - i own three of my own buisnesses - doing over three million dollars a year in revenue. Happen to have a masters in business. Your candidacy is laughable at this point. Lemonade stands and paper routes don't count. Identify yourself our consider yourself the coward you are. I will say now - I DON'T WANT YOUR PERSONAL VOTE. Please keep it and use it to make yourself feel like more of a man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Continuity Czar Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 And your running for congress? You've lost any election from your posts here. You definately show immaturity. I'm not, Dave is. He's just letting me use his computer to respond to anonymous losers. Those people who identify themselves are the ones he respects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 Lemonade stands and paper routes don't count. Identify yourself our consider yourself the coward you are. I will say now - I DON'T WANT YOUR PERSONAL VOTE. Please keep it and use it to make yourself feel like more of a man. WOW! You are one disturbed individual. I think I just have to email this thread to a freind who is a reporter at the press. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 Like you have a friend Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 If BC Voice was representitive of the entire 22nd congressional district, then Rev. Grate might have something to worry about. However, it doesn't so please feel free to campaign against and slander him all you want. He thrives on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 9, 2008 Report Share Posted March 9, 2008 I'm not, Dave is. He's just letting me use his computer to respond to anonymous losers. Those people who identify themselves are the ones he respects. Yea right - he let you use his computer and gave you his login and password for bc voice as well. Now we not only have a crazy man running for congress who insults the voters - we hae a full fledged liar as well. You are truly a fruitcake and nut job. I forwarded this thread to the Press - WBNG - Fox News and to Hinchesy office, so they too can see what a whack job you are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Fighting for Grate Posted March 10, 2008 Report Share Posted March 10, 2008 Yea right - he let you use his computer and gave you his login and password for bc voice as well. Now we not only have a crazy man running for congress who insults the voters - we hae a full fledged liar as well. You are truly a fruitcake and nut job. I forwarded this thread to the Press - WBNG - Fox News and to Hinchesy office, so they too can see what a whack job you are. I had a really nice response for you - but decided that you would only use it against Rev Grate, so will keep my mouth shut. As for his password, he uses the same one for every account he uses and everyone who works for him, or has ever worked with him knows it. It was public knowledge to everyone at his magazine and newspaper. And, as far as I know, he never logs off any computers he uses - except his laptop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.