Ed Arzouian Posted March 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 24, 2008 Actually I have said for years I did not do them...., and the court agreed. What about Tarik's hypocrisy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 24, 2008 Report Share Posted March 24, 2008 Actually I have said for years I did not do them...., and the court agreed. What about Tarik's hypocrisy? but you did posess a gun illegally and you did posess cocaine and you did send over 500 emails staling and harrasing people. That the ruth bro - dat the truth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Arzouian Posted March 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 24, 2008 but you did posess a gun illegally and you did posess cocaine and you did send over 500 emails staling and harrasing people. That the ruth bro - dat the truth no, it is not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 24, 2008 Report Share Posted March 24, 2008 no, it is not. the whole world lies and everyone is out to get ed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 24, 2008 Report Share Posted March 24, 2008 no, it is not. What part of it is not true today ed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 24, 2008 Report Share Posted March 24, 2008 he snitched on his dealer. ane they dropped charge. it is sealed up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Arzouian Posted March 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 24, 2008 What part of it is not true today ed? Today? All of it... I see we have no response to Tarik's idea of equality and social justice do we. Judging by the amount of effort being used to change the subject I'd say he is very worried............ What are the penailites for what Tarik is alleged to have done? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 24, 2008 Report Share Posted March 24, 2008 Today? All of it... I see we have no response to Tarik's idea of equality and social justice do we. Judging by the amount of effort being used to change the subject I'd say he is very worried............ What are the penailites for what Tarik is alleged to have done? so you did not write 500 emails? did not posess drugs? did not have a gun in your apt? did not harass? LOL - you are one truly messed up dude ed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Arzouian Posted March 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 24, 2008 And that explains Tarik Abdelazim seeking to obstruct justice in what way? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 24, 2008 Report Share Posted March 24, 2008 And that explains Tarik Abdelazim seeking to obstruct justice in what way? so now you are sying he did seek to obstruct justice while before you said you dont really know that at all, that it someone else alledging it - but now you are alledging it - WOW!! You are one jacked up dude! also - you did not answer - so you did not write 500 emails? did not posess drugs? did not have a gun in your apt? did not harass? LOL - you are one truly messed up dude ed. When you find yourself in a hole - stop diggin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Arzouian Posted March 25, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 25, 2008 also - you did not answer - so you did not write 500 emails? did not posess drugs? did not have a gun in your apt? did not harass? LOL - you are one truly messed up dude ed. How many times in how many ways do you want me to respond? Again, clearly the question was answered: QUOTE (Guest @ Mar 24 2008, 10:34 PM) but you did posess a gun illegally and you did posess cocaine and you did send over 500 emails staling and harrasing people. That the ruth bro - dat the truth no, it is not. As for Tarik's alleged actions, obstruction of justice, let's hope the District Attorney looks into them. @ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 25, 2008 Report Share Posted March 25, 2008 Any comment from Citizen Action on this hypocrisy by their boy Tarik? How do the other protesters feel about Maria Theresa Starzman trying to get special treatment through her boyfriend Tarik? Where's that solidarity? Come on Tarik, let's get some of your verbose bovine excrement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 25, 2008 Report Share Posted March 25, 2008 How many times in how many ways do you want me to respond? Again, clearly the question was answered: As for Tarik's alleged actions, obstruction of justice, let's hope the District Attorney looks into them. @ You have NOT answered the question.....all you do is dodge and try to deflect attention to others. Did you or did you not send those e-mails? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 25, 2008 Report Share Posted March 25, 2008 You have NOT answered the question.....all you do is dodge and try to deflect attention to others. Did you or did you not send those e-mails? The question has been answered many times. about 500 emails may have been sent over 18 months to about 30 or 40 individuals at The Gazette. Here is one example, others include golf tee start times and jokes. not ethe date and name of Peter Stockland the Editor-in-Chief of The Gazette whom I golfed with about three weeks prior to this email. You get the idea why this was thrown out of court.: This piece below was submitted one week after the WTC attack. As you can see Peter Stockland, Gazette Editor-in Chief said it raised excellent points. Peter Hadekel, Editorial Page Editor, instructed Wayne Lowrie, Op-Ed Editor, to "kill it", saying, "the story had moved passed this point". Mr. Hadekel told me that firsthand on the phone at the time. Three months later USA Today printed a similar piece with regard to the evacuation with many of the same facts, though they had three complete pages where I was only supposed to have 750 words according to my arrangement with Mr. Stockland. Mr. Hadekel was removed as Editorial Page Editor upon the arrival of The Gazette's new President and Publisher Larry Smith in February 2002. Ed A. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stockland, Peter (mon_exchange)" <PStockland:)thegazette.southam.ca To: "'Ed not allowed'" <enot allowed:)hotmail.com Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 2:58 PM Subject: RE: World Trade Center Question, my submission Ed: I've sent this over to Wayne Lowrie, our comment page editor. I've mentioned to him I think it raises some excellent points. If you don't hear back from him in a day or so, let me know. Cheers, stockland ---------- From: Ed not allowed Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 11:32 PM To: Gazette Stockland Subject: World Trade Center Question, my submission Peter, Most of this is new or at least not mentioned much anywhere from what I have seen or heard, perhaps it had been too early but now it is becoming time. World Trade Center Questions by Ed not allowed A week has passed since the attack on the World Trade Centers, certainly not enough time to put any of the grief behind, only about 200 bodies of the 5097 now reported missing are even accounted for. But after a week it is perhaps time to start asking a few of the hard questions which must inevitably be asked. There were failures that occurred that cost lives. There were bad judgments calls made, the people that made those calls may not even be alive or if they are the burden they must live with is unimaginable, but yet a review of the decisions must take place to ensure that better calls are made in the future. By now everyone knows the first American Airlines Flight 11 hit the North Tower at 8:45AM. Fifteen minutes later at 9:00AM United Airlines Flight 175 hit the South Tower. Exactly one hour later at 10:00AM the South Tower collapsed. The North Tower collapsed 29 minutes later at 10:29AM. Numerous first hand accounts have confirmed and even answering machine tapes have recorded the public address system in the South Tower assuring occupants that they were not in danger after the first plane hit the North Tower. Who made that decision and why? Had the South Tower been immediately evacuated after the North Tower was hit many more lives could have been saved. Very little could be done for those above the crash in the North Tower but others could have been saved. Some companies such as the Fuji Bank located on the 79th floor of the South Tower ignored the PA announcement and did tell their employees to leave. The second plane went right through their offices but they had already left. They survived. According to survivors it took the average mobile person approximately 45 minutes to make it out of the building from the 65th floor. The first twenty-five floors down from 65 to 40 took only about 15 minutes. The second plane went into the South Tower around the 79th floor stranding those above in the 31 floors of the 110-floor building. Had the evacuation of the South Tower begun immediately after the North Tower was hit all but 11 floors of the South Tower could have been evacuated below were the second plane went in. All those people could have safely exited the South Tower. After the bombing of the World Trade Centers in 1993 how could anybody in charge of security for those building not decide to evacuate immediately? Why not err on the side of safety and ask everyone to leave First hand accounts from survivors who were descending from the 79th floor tell of encountering FBI agents going up in the stairwells around the 50th the floor. Those FBI agents told the people exiting the building was not necessary. The survivors in question ignored the advice and lived. Presumably those FBI agents did not make it out alive. How did the FBI make that call? Again, why risk leaving people in the building? The FBI also has another problem to explain. It appears the CIA did what it was supposed to with some of the intelligence. The CIA had the names of two of the highjackers who were living in San Diego, two terrorists who ended up on American Airlines Flight 77 from Dulles International, which crashed into the Pentagon. Since by law the CIA cannot surveil in the US, it passed the information along to the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) and the FBI. The INS informed the FBI the two suspects had entered the US. The FBI had them on a "watch list" but the suspects were still able to purchase airline tickets in their own name. The FBI was not able to locate these two suspects in the two weeks before the attack. Another very questionable decision involves the location of New York City Mayor's Office of Emergency Management at 7 World Trade Center on the 23rd Floor. Its web site is still up but the building is not. Since 1993 the Trade Towers were known to be terrorists targets. Why would you place your Emergency Management Office at the place most likely to be a target and in an unsecured location? An emergency management office should be like the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) Hurricane Centre in Florida in a flood and hurricane proof building or the situation room at the White House which is nuclear bomb-resistant. Such a center should have its own backup power, phone systems, water, perhaps even its own reserve air supply or filtration system . New York has miles and miles of unused underground tunnels originally intended for subway lines or tunnels out of Manhattan which were never built. Why not build a bunker in one of those or place the Office of Emergency Management in a non-descript, secured building away from primary terrorist targets or the congested, difficult to access streets of lower Manhattan? Had the emergency management office been in such a location it might be there now to provide assistance in this crisis instead of laying in ruins. Certainly as we go forward there will be many question to address these are but a few obvious ones. -30- @ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Arzouian Posted March 26, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 26, 2008 No comments, huh...... I'd still like Tarik to explain how he can reconcile asking for special treatment for his girlfriend with his idea of social justice? Anytime, Tarik... While on the subject, how many low income residents have been assisted in getting on the Internet with your muni wifi system? Did you buy them new wireless cards and upgrade their computers so they could use them? Did you buy them new laptops with your $8000 raise? Maybe you buddy Schweitzer can pay for them? @ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.