4,000 Dead, when will it end?

[Guest Guest]

That is right. Just since the first of the year, there have been 4,000 people killed by drunk drivers. This is a slaughter. No one volunteered for this. Women and children, cut down in the prime of their life. Lost limbs, paralysis and scarred people litter the highway.

 

When will the slaughter end?

 

http://www.alcoholalert.com/drunk-driving-statistics.html

[Guest Guest]

That is right. Just since the first of the year, there have been 4,000 people killed by drunk drivers. This is a slaughter. No one volunteered for this. Women and children, cut down in the prime of their life. Lost limbs, paralysis and scarred people litter the highway.

 

When will the slaughter end?

 

http://www.alcoholalert.com/drunk-driving-statistics.html

 

 

 

 

 

It never will!

[Guest Guest]

Viet Nam all over agin.

The injured sustain some real serious "for life" injuries ---

[Guest Guest]

That is right. Just since the first of the year, there have been 4,000 people killed by drunk drivers. This is a slaughter. No one volunteered for this. Women and children, cut down in the prime of their life. Lost limbs, paralysis and scarred people litter the highway.

 

When will the slaughter end?

 

http://www.alcoholalert.com/drunk-driving-statistics.html

 

Well, what we are going to do to stop it is have a "surge" bringng in more drunk drivers and allowing them to drink more. This will be a sure fire way to stop drunk driving and stop people from being killed. It has to work, I can not see why it would not work.

 

[Guest Henry K]

The war in Iraq will not end as long as we elect Republicans to office.

 

I'm not sure that it will end soon if we elect Democrats.

 

That is the kind of mess we are in.

 

Of course, the war in Afghanistan will go on longer that Iraq.

 

And who knows what kind of evil Cheney is preparing on his trip.

 

Do you think there is any kind of agreement between the three religious groups in Iraq that will hold together if the US ever leaves. If that is the definition of victory, we are there forever.

 

 

 

[Guest Guest]

The war in Iraq will not end as long as we elect Republicans to office.

 

I'm not sure that it will end soon if we elect Democrats.

 

That is the kind of mess we are in.

 

Of course, the war in Afghanistan will go on longer that Iraq.

 

And who knows what kind of evil Cheney is preparing on his trip.

 

Do you think there is any kind of agreement between the three religious groups in Iraq that will hold together if the US ever leaves. If that is the definition of victory, we are there forever.

 

Sorry, you must be in the wrong topic. This is about the 4,000 Americans who have been killed by drunk drivers since Jan 1, 2008.

 

[Guest Guest]

The war in Iraq will not end as long as we elect Republicans to office.

 

I'm not sure that it will end soon if we elect Democrats.

 

That is the kind of mess we are in.

 

Of course, the war in Afghanistan will go on longer that Iraq.

 

And who knows what kind of evil Cheney is preparing on his trip.

 

Do you think there is any kind of agreement between the three religious groups in Iraq that will hold together if the US ever leaves. If that is the definition of victory, we are there forever.

 

 

I think this thread is about Drunk Driving, not the war in Iraq. Been tipping a few already this morning?

[Guest Guest]

The war in Iraq will not end as long as we elect Republicans to office.

 

I'm not sure that it will end soon if we elect Democrats.

 

That is the kind of mess we are in.

 

Of course, the war in Afghanistan will go on longer that Iraq.

 

And who knows what kind of evil Cheney is preparing on his trip.

 

Do you think there is any kind of agreement between the three religious groups in Iraq that will hold together if the US ever leaves. If that is the definition of victory, we are there forever.

BDS

 

 

@

[Guest Guest]

I think this thread is about Drunk Driving, not the war in Iraq. Been tipping a few already this morning?

 

Clearly, the intent of the post was to divert attentions from the deaths in Iraq by somehow equating it to traffic deaths, as if there is any correlation. If you can't see that, you have been tipping a few.

 

[Guest Preacher]

Clearly, the intent of the post was to divert attentions from the deaths in Iraq by somehow equating it to traffic deaths, as if there is any correlation. If you can't see that, you have been tipping a few.

 

You're exactly right - it's a common and disgraceful tactic used by so-called conservative "patriots" who are actually degrading and defaming the deaths of those who served by using such comparisons.

 

They, like that piglet Cheney, look upon the deaths of the military and say "So?"

 

Eternal Damnation is too good for the lot of them.

 

 

@

[Guest Guest]

You're exactly right - it's a common and disgraceful tactic used by so-called conservative "patriots" who are actually degrading and defaming the deaths of those who served by using such comparisons.

 

They, like that piglet Cheney, look upon the deaths of the military and say "So?"

 

Eternal Damnation is too good for the lot of them.

 

 

@

 

If people like you ruled the US in the '40's we would have lost WWII.

 

[Guest Guest]

If people like you ruled the US in the '40's we would have lost WWII.

 

now that is about the funnies thing I have seen on the voice to date - I do hope you were joking.

 

 

@

[Guest Guest]

now that is about the funnies thing I have seen on the voice to date - I do hope you were joking.

 

 

@

 

No joke.

[Guest Guest]

You're exactly right - it's a common and disgraceful tactic used by so-called conservative "patriots" who are actually degrading and defaming the deaths of those who served by using such comparisons.

 

They, like that piglet Cheney, look upon the deaths of the military and say "So?"

 

Eternal Damnation is too good for the lot of them.

 

 

@

Where is the outcry concerning these deaths. Why are there no pictures or bios of the people who are killed by drunk drivers? Why is this not a daily topic on the nightly news? Why are there no interviews with the survivors? Why are there no pictures of faces scarred in accidents or photos of the victims with missing libs?

These are the real questions?

 

 

[Guest Guest]

Maybe you're aware of MADD, SADD, the State Police trying to stop drunk driving.

 

The problem about the Iraq deaths is that they are the result of one man drunk on power.

 

They are young people put in harms way for no good reason, that makes both a tragedy, perhaps none more than the other.

 

Both senseless.

 

Both a waste.

 

Both a felony.

 

The perpetrators of both should go to jail.

[Guest Guest]

Maybe you're aware of MADD, SADD, the State Police trying to stop drunk driving.

 

The problem about the Iraq deaths is that they are the result of one man drunk on power.

 

They are young people put in harms way for no good reason, that makes both a tragedy, perhaps none more than the other.

 

Both senseless.

 

Both a waste.

 

Both a felony.

 

The perpetrators of both should go to jail.

 

You didn't answer my questions. Why no media exposure every day.

You dodged the question quite well. That is because you can only dodge the question because the answer is despicable.

 

[Guest Guest]

There is media coverage every time there is a death by a drunk drive. There is coverage of their arrest and trial. SADD gets coverage all of the time.

 

You say there is something despicable going on, well, what is it?

[Guest Guest]

There is media coverage every time there is a death by a drunk drive. There is coverage of their arrest and trial. SADD gets coverage all of the time.

 

You say there is something despicable going on, well, what is it?

Oh, so there is a section in Sunday's paper that lists the deceased, with pictures and home towns and a bio?

When was the last time you saw a video of a person missing a limb due to a drunk driver vs a soldier in Iraq?

Do we get articles in the paper when a person from Iowa is killed in a Drunk driving accident or when a person from Iowa gets killed in Iraq?

You are so full of it.

 

 

[Guest Guest]

So that's what is so despicable! Quite the conspiracy there.

 

Actually, now that you mention it, the Iraq war has been on the back burner recently, the administration would like us to forget about their mess. Say you're right, that is despicable.

[Guest Guest]

So that's what is so despicable! Quite the conspiracy there.

 

Actually, now that you mention it, the Iraq war has been on the back burner recently, the administration would like us to forget about their mess. Say you're right, that is despicable.

Now that Hillary made her stupid statement about being under sniper fire in Bosnia, it does put Iraq on the back burner for a day or two.

Too bad drunk driving isn't on the back burner, it isn't even on the stove.

 

[NY Patriot]

The Iraq war is not a war against terrorism. Sadam was no threat to the US or it's allies. Sadam harbored no terrorists or weapons of mass destruction. It's not a war for oil either. The US has gained nothing from Iraqi oil. The Iraq war is nothing more than a war of ego. GWB wanted to be known as a war president. Well he's done that but instead of being a great conquerer he will be known as the worst president in US history. GWB wanted to finish his fathers war. At least the senior Bush knew better than to conquer and occupy Iraq. It's clearly a war for profit. If you don't see that your a blind fool. And now McCain wants us to be there for 100 years. Clearly McCain has bought into the GWB ideology. McCain has ensured the republican parties loss for another republican president. The militaries stop/loss program has ensured that another generation of American men and women will be as screwed up as the last. But thats ok with Cheney as our service men and women volunteered.

 

Withdrawl from Iraq doesn't equate to defeat.

[Guest Guest]

The Iraq war is not a war against terrorism. Sadam was no threat to the US or it's allies. Sadam harbored no terrorists or weapons of mass destruction. It's not a war for oil either. The US has gained nothing from Iraqi oil. The Iraq war is nothing more than a war of ego. GWB wanted to be known as a war president. Well he's done that but instead of being a great conquerer he will be known as the worst president in US history. GWB wanted to finish his fathers war. At least the senior Bush knew better than to conquer and occupy Iraq. It's clearly a war for profit. If you don't see that your a blind fool. And now McCain wants us to be there for 100 years. Clearly McCain has bought into the GWB ideology. McCain has ensured the republican parties loss for another republican president. The militaries stop/loss program has ensured that another generation of American men and women will be as screwed up as the last. But thats ok with Cheney as our service men and women volunteered.

 

Withdrawl from Iraq doesn't equate to defeat.

 

Classic BDS sufferer.

 

[Guest Guest]

The Iraq war is not a war against terrorism. Sadam was no threat to the US or it's allies. Sadam harbored no terrorists or weapons of mass destruction. It's not a war for oil either. The US has gained nothing from Iraqi oil. The Iraq war is nothing more than a war of ego. GWB wanted to be known as a war president. Well he's done that but instead of being a great conquerer he will be known as the worst president in US history. GWB wanted to finish his fathers war. At least the senior Bush knew better than to conquer and occupy Iraq. It's clearly a war for profit. If you don't see that your a blind fool. And now McCain wants us to be there for 100 years. Clearly McCain has bought into the GWB ideology. McCain has ensured the republican parties loss for another republican president. The militaries stop/loss program has ensured that another generation of American men and women will be as screwed up as the last. But thats ok with Cheney as our service men and women volunteered.

 

Withdrawl from Iraq doesn't equate to defeat.

 

 

I couldn't agree more.

 

I will add: The Bushbots will tell you that now that we're in Iraq, we ARE fighting terrorism there because al qaeda is there killing our soldiers.

They keep forgetting that al qaeda is there only because we opened the borders, and, by our mere presence, invited them there.

Where else are they going to go to get a few shots at Americans? We're right in their back yard!!

 

Of course, every time we kill a few "insurgents", the White House jumps at the chance to say we killed more "terrorists." How can they know exactly who they've killed. al qaeda members don't wear uniforms nor do they carry membership cards in their wallets.

 

It's a total guessing game as to how many "insurgents" are al qaeda and how many are Baathists or other Iraqis angry about an American occupation of Iraq.

[Guest Guest]

Classic BDS sufferer.

 

 

Fantastic reply.

 

Can't discuss anything....ever.

 

 

All you have is a few names to throw out.

 

What an intellect. If you were running the "war", it'd be bungled 1,000% more than the Bungler in Chief already has. I can't picture how that's possible, but I'm sure you'd find a way.

[Guest Guest]

Fantastic reply.

 

Can't discuss anything....ever.

 

 

All you have is a few names to throw out.

 

What an intellect. If you were running the "war", it'd be bungled 1,000% more than the Bungler in Chief already has. I can't picture how that's possible, but I'm sure you'd find a way.

The topic is the number of drunk driver killings in this country, not Bush. If you want to discuss Bush, start your own thread and go to it.

Goodbye.

 

 

@