Guest Himler Posted January 16, 2013 Report Share Posted January 16, 2013 Why? To protect oneself against the imported NYC welfare scum like this: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted January 16, 2013 Report Share Posted January 16, 2013 Making numbers up in the past never helped your case, why do you think doing so now would change things? You cowards like to imply that all gun owners are criminals or future criminals. Show me where my number isn't accurate or at least much more accurate than you care to admit. Like every other challenge, you are not up to an intelligent answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted January 16, 2013 Report Share Posted January 16, 2013 You cowards like to imply that all gun owners are criminals or future criminals. Show me where my number isn't accurate or at least much more accurate than you care to admit. Like every other challenge, you are not up to an intelligent answer. Why should I help make a fool out of you? You do that all by yourself by making up numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted January 16, 2013 Report Share Posted January 16, 2013 Why should I help make a fool out of you? You do that all by yourself by making up numbers. Stiiiiiiiill nothing. You are more consistent than the sunrise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 16, 2013 Report Share Posted January 16, 2013 Too bad there has been no executive order to prevent the Federal Government from selling weapons to Mexican Drug Cartels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted January 16, 2013 Report Share Posted January 16, 2013 Stiiiiiiiill nothing. You are more consistent than the sunrise. 85% of legal gun owners commit a crime at least once in their lifetime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted January 16, 2013 Report Share Posted January 16, 2013 They just arrested a guy in Binghamton who had 3 loaded handguns in his car. Any more questions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted January 16, 2013 Report Share Posted January 16, 2013 85% of legal gun owners commit a crime at least once in their lifetime. Are you sure of that number? i read it was 83.0135711302699067320091255632423324% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JB 2 Posted January 16, 2013 Report Share Posted January 16, 2013 With rights come responsibility - that is the part gun nuts are missing. Now you are confusing me! You and your sort continue to insist guns are the problem, yet now you infer it is the people possessing the guns that are the problem? Maybe you would feel safer if you move to one of the Gun Free Zones? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 16, 2013 Report Share Posted January 16, 2013 What is the one reason you can give me as to why i should not own one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted January 16, 2013 Report Share Posted January 16, 2013 85% of legal gun owners commit a crime at least once in their lifetime. 100 percent of cowardly liberals sleep with children. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted January 16, 2013 Report Share Posted January 16, 2013 What is the one reason you can give me as to why i should not own one? Because it is illegal. Duh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted January 16, 2013 Report Share Posted January 16, 2013 They just arrested a guy in Binghamton who had 3 loaded handguns in his car. Any more questions? A felon. Not a legal gun owner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted January 16, 2013 Report Share Posted January 16, 2013 100 percent of cowardly liberals sleep with children. Catholic Priests are cowardly liberals? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest david goliath Posted January 16, 2013 Report Share Posted January 16, 2013 A few thoughts from a sane, balanced person who does not have a stake in the gun debate: First, for those comparing deaths caused by cars and deaths caused by guns, it's apples to oranges and there is no viable comparison. The automobile and the gun are designed for different uses, and comparing one to the other to make a point about guns being 'safe' is ludicrous. Along that same concept, those who are saying 'guns don't kill people' true, people kill people, and when doing mass killings, they tend to use an assault rifle as a weapon of choice. The issue here is mass killings. It would certainly be harder to use a different tool or weapon other than an assault rifle or multiple 'guns' to do mass killings. You never (or rarely) ever hear of mass killings done by poison, or swords, or knives, etc.... mass killings are usually related to gun use (or bombs, but typically guns are used). For those who are pushing the 'second ammendment' and the 'it is our right' - please understand how old the constituion is and what the right to bear arms was at the time it was written. There were no semi-automatic pistols or rifles at that time. Before the pro-gun folk beat me up, please understand I am not against gun ownership. I fully support people's right to own arms, but it must make sense, and in no way does owning an assault rifle make sense. For those worried that only the criminals will have them, well, then it will be easy to identify criminal conduct when any assault type weapon is found. You can not make a rational justification why your average citizen and/or home owner would need to own a semi-automatic assault type firearm. Keep trying, but throughout this discussion, I have yet to see one make a valid point. You can defend your home and property with a firearm, but it would be hard for a nut-case to go on a mas murdering spree with a six shooter, and much easier for bystanders to stop such a nut if he had to stop shooting and reload without being able to just keep the trigger down and unload. Let's be real. Assault type rifles and handguns are designed for one purpose, to kill. Like it or not, that is what it is. Cars may kill people too (or irresponsible drivers in cars because we know inanimate objects do not kill people) but that is not what they are built to do, it is an unfortunate side effect whereas assault guns are purpose built for mass shooting/killing. just some thoughts... enjoy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted January 16, 2013 Report Share Posted January 16, 2013 Here's another thought.... All of those points have been addressed and demolished. Go sit in the corner and put your pointy hat back on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted January 16, 2013 Report Share Posted January 16, 2013 Demolished? No. You refuse to accept anything that goes against your gun-ho 'government is out to get me' mentality. The poster made many valid points and your rebuttal is akin to something a 10 year old girl would give. Accept the fact that this is now law and sitting on here day and night complaining about it isn't going to change anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted January 16, 2013 Report Share Posted January 16, 2013 Nice try but none of you girls have been able to answer the single question I have posed numerous times. You simply pile failure upon failure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest david goliath Posted January 16, 2013 Report Share Posted January 16, 2013 Here's another thought.... All of those points have been addressed and demolished. Go sit in the corner and put your pointy hat back on. Brilliant response, well thought out and very articulate. You are right, you win. (at least, in your mind you do....) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 16, 2013 Report Share Posted January 16, 2013 A few thoughts from a sane, balanced person who does not have a stake in the gun debate: First, for those comparing deaths caused by cars and deaths caused by guns, it's apples to oranges and there is no viable comparison. The automobile and the gun are designed for different uses, and comparing one to the other to make a point about guns being 'safe' is ludicrous. Along that same concept, those who are saying 'guns don't kill people' true, people kill people, and when doing mass killings, they tend to use an assault rifle as a weapon of choice. The issue here is mass killings. It would certainly be harder to use a different tool or weapon other than an assault rifle or multiple 'guns' to do mass killings. You never (or rarely) ever hear of mass killings done by poison, or swords, or knives, etc.... mass killings are usually related to gun use (or bombs, but typically guns are used). For those who are pushing the 'second ammendment' and the 'it is our right' - please understand how old the constituion is and what the right to bear arms was at the time it was written. There were no semi-automatic pistols or rifles at that time. Before the pro-gun folk beat me up, please understand I am not against gun ownership. I fully support people's right to own arms, but it must make sense, and in no way does owning an assault rifle make sense. For those worried that only the criminals will have them, well, then it will be easy to identify criminal conduct when any assault type weapon is found. You can not make a rational justification why your average citizen and/or home owner would need to own a semi-automatic assault type firearm. Keep trying, but throughout this discussion, I have yet to see one make a valid point. You can defend your home and property with a firearm, but it would be hard for a nut-case to go on a mas murdering spree with a six shooter, and much easier for bystanders to stop such a nut if he had to stop shooting and reload without being able to just keep the trigger down and unload. Let's be real. Assault type rifles and handguns are designed for one purpose, to kill. Like it or not, that is what it is. Cars may kill people too (or irresponsible drivers in cars because we know inanimate objects do not kill people) but that is not what they are built to do, it is an unfortunate side effect whereas assault guns are purpose built for mass shooting/killing. just some thoughts... enjoy. You cannot give one good reason why a responsible average citizen shouldent have one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted January 16, 2013 Report Share Posted January 16, 2013 It is very clear that nobody here can give an intelligent and reasoned argument for why a law abiding, responsible citizen should have further restrictions on their firearm ownership. There is no justification for it. It does not affect violent crime. It does not address criminals or people with mental health issues. Like it or not, the courts have ruled that it is an individual right. The 2 nd amendment's purpose is to prevent tyranny. That is clear from all historical documentation. You can complain that it is over 200 years old but it is as important now as it was then. Just like all the other amendments. The left can't separate their emotions from the horrible incident in sandy hook. They don't seem to have much of a grasp of history, including the last few decades. They ignore facts that don't support their position. I support background checks for every gun sale.i support better supervision and reporting of people with mental health issues who are dangerous. There seems to be a privacy issue with that that needs to be worked out. We had an "assault weapon" ban for ten years and even it's authors had to admit that it had no effect on crime. There is no point in doing it again though I am confident they will. Banning anything based on its appearance is the dumbest thing going. Obviously reason and facts won't sway those who have an irrational and unjustified fear of inanimate objects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted January 17, 2013 Report Share Posted January 17, 2013 You cannot give one good reason why a responsible average citizen shouldent have one. Because it's illegal now. Duh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted January 17, 2013 Report Share Posted January 17, 2013 Because it's illegal now. Duh! Nice try, child. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted January 17, 2013 Report Share Posted January 17, 2013 It is illegal now, Zero. Have you not been paying attention? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted January 17, 2013 Report Share Posted January 17, 2013 Because it's illegal now. Duh! Really.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.