ginger Posted March 11, 2022 Report Share Posted March 11, 2022 Lol 2 way street. That's rich. A two way street would imply they sort of have SOME equal standing? Not even close. Not on ANY LEVEL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bingking Posted March 11, 2022 Report Share Posted March 11, 2022 51 minutes ago, ginger said: Lol 2 way street. That's rich. A two way street would imply they sort of have SOME equal standing? Not even close. Not on ANY LEVEL. Lol weren’t you are the same person who said Emily is a child. Please tell us how you know it was not consensual ?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
92CorruptCourtStreet Posted March 11, 2022 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2022 2 hours ago, Bingking said: she posted a consent to change attorney court document today Haha I just saw that and looks like she’s up to the same ol’e games of using online sample court docs and editing them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginger Posted March 11, 2022 Report Share Posted March 11, 2022 3 hours ago, Bingking said: Lol weren’t you are the same person who said Emily is a child. Please tell us how you know it was not consensual ?? Can a 6yr old consent? There's a photo I posted not too long ago of some ceremony. Emily is standing between Jason Garner and Mayor David wearing a bright yellow turtleneck with bright yellow tights and a green plaid jumper. Every video she posts is infantile. And BTW. I actually was not arguing consent.. I was arguing level playing field but you opened the door so... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginger Posted March 11, 2022 Report Share Posted March 11, 2022 Now that I think about it.. Has anyone thought to have Emily checked for lead poisoning? That building, the products she uses, she and her parents live in older homes... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solak Supporter Posted March 11, 2022 Report Share Posted March 11, 2022 6 hours ago, Bingking said: Everyone is well aware that it was a two-way street and many people are aware that she was using him for art funding , you can make this illusion that she is a victim when she was Not and as queenb said it was consensual. maybe you are confused by Ms. Jablon’s stories just like how she posted a “letter of engagement “ from an attorney which is meant for describing fees and services and yet she wants us to believe it is a contract between the two just like how she posted a consent to change attorney court document today that is of course edited and you can see under her attempt to blur the area where her attorney would sign and there are no signature if you zoom in. Consensual or not, what manner of “Southern Tier values” is using people for sex, and denigrating women as “side pieces” and “f**k friends”? How is our future state senator aided by you and two others pounding this subject into the ground, and continually calling attention to the glaring contradiction between campaigning on a “Southern Tier values”platform, while sexually using and dismissively objectifying females? What women voters are impressed by such a contradiction? Shouldn’t someone with “Southern Tier values” have married a girl from the Southern Tier, like the girl from Sidney? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bingking Posted March 11, 2022 Report Share Posted March 11, 2022 1 hour ago, Solak Supporter said: Consensual or not, what manner of “Southern Tier values” is using people for sex, and denigrating women as “side pieces” and “f**k friends”? How is our future state senator aided by you and two others pounding this subject into the ground, and continually calling attention to the glaring contradiction between campaigning on a “Southern Tier values”platform, while sexually using and dismissively objectifying females? What women voters are impressed by such a contradiction? Shouldn’t someone with “Southern Tier values” have married a girl from the Southern Tier, like the girl from Sidney? I understand what you are trying to say however “Using “ people for sex is not “fuck friends” as you say because “fuck friends” is mutual which is what it appears to be between Emily and Rich and many others are aware of it. I am not here to aid rich David as you say, I am here to call out the bS as I see it every day and thank you to BCVoice for providing the platform. Emily should not of posted that Diary she posted on Facebook as I grabbed a screenshot of it and she seemed all too worried if she was going to continue to get more “summer jobs” when rich was no longer taking her phone calls. Sounds like someone was getting annoyed with all of the demands . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soccer watcher Posted March 12, 2022 Report Share Posted March 12, 2022 46 minutes ago, Bingking said: I understand what you are trying to say however “Using “ people for sex is not “fuck friends” as you say because “fuck friends” is mutual which is what it appears to be between Emily and Rich and many others are aware of it. If Emily is as crazy as some of you say, is she able to consent? It can’t be mutual if you’re not able to consent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solak Supporter Posted March 12, 2022 Report Share Posted March 12, 2022 4 hours ago, ginger said: And BTW. I actually was not arguing consent.. I was arguing level playing field Federal case law holds that consenting to sex does not necessarily, nor automatically preclude someone from pursuing a Title VII sexual harassment claim. So, the level playing field, or the employer/employee relationship, is an important consideration. If there was an employer/employee relationship, our future senator may have some difficult questions to answer under oath. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bingking Posted March 12, 2022 Report Share Posted March 12, 2022 1 hour ago, soccer watcher said: If Emily is as crazy as some of you say, is she able to consent? It can’t be mutual if you’re not able to consent. She even admitted The judge told her in court she’s incapacitated and incapable of making decisions and he ordered a 730 mental hygiene evaluation on her and that she’s not allowed to fire her attorney until she finds a new one so therefore you are correct she does have something in her possession that seems odd for a defendant to be handling especially since she said the judge told her she is incapacitated. Another reason why it’s highly unlikely it’s a real court document and I did see she posted a letter of engagement from a law firm in the same post and claimed that she already has an attorney but a letter of engagement describes the attorneys services and fees which is a pathetic attempt to make it look like she has some sort of retainer. Funny how she has now deleted the letter of engagement, maybe she is reading my posts lol. she has edited documents and communications before and she even posted a photo and left her photo editor up on the post which is on this website BCVoice and I have screenshots of edited post that she put up for instance she posted a text message she claimed was from a lawyer that was paid off by Rich David and then she posted the same text message and she forgot to unblur the top portion that said it was from her mother. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bingking Posted March 12, 2022 Report Share Posted March 12, 2022 37 minutes ago, Solak Supporter said: So, the level playing field, or the employer/employee relationship, is an important consideration. Interesting because Ms. Jablon said online that they responded to her Inquiry with the EEOC and they said that she never worked for them so that kinda throws out your argument. funny how she’s been saying all this time that her case is in court and she has them charged with crimes but yet she said a point where it hasn’t even gotten to court and she is online saying she has to respond and she’s late on her rebuttals. Clearly the state has not even investigated the claims of Ms. Jablon despite her claiming she had them investigated. I remember watching a video where she said that she has to respond and then it gets investigate it and then it goes to court which kind of doesn’t line up with previous statements Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solak Supporter Posted March 12, 2022 Report Share Posted March 12, 2022 58 minutes ago, Bingking said: Interesting because Ms. Jablon said online that they responded to her Inquiry with the EEOC and they said that she never worked for them so that kinda throws out your argument. funny how she’s been saying all this time that her case is in court and she has them charged with crimes but yet she said a point where it hasn’t even gotten to court and she is online saying she has to respond and she’s late on her rebuttals. Clearly the state has not even investigated the claims of Ms. Jablon despite her claiming she had them investigated. I remember watching a video where she said that she has to respond and then it gets investigate it and then it goes to court which kind of doesn’t line up with previous statements EEOC does not necessarily have the last word. A federal district court does, and might view that Columbus Park project as employment, whether it was paid or not, and whether any sex that went on during that employment was consensual or not. So, our future senator may find himself answerable to a federal court action while in office. Your bs detector seems to go in only one direction. Doesn’t campaigning on a “Southern Tier values” platform strike you as about as cynical as someone can get given the circumstances? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bingking Posted March 12, 2022 Report Share Posted March 12, 2022 The news channel 34 article stated she didn’t have a contract in place when she completed the walk so that may very well be the reason why she wasn't employed with them. A federal court would not decide whether any sex between rich and Emily was consensual or not regardless of if she was employed or not as it has been noted on BCVoice that there is evidence proof through her own admissions online that the sex was consensual and I believe Queenb or fact checker mentioned the screen shots of those posts were saved.. Her claims are not filed in NYS court because she does not have an actual lawsuit filed in court and there is a very slim chance any federal prosecutor would take Miss. Jablon serious based on her history of Bs and every day she posts something it tends to come to light let’s just say not in her favor. On the other hand yes Rich David is not so souther tier value and his past is not on the up and up given all of the stories about his past if true like the wegmans incident, them multiple red roof incidents I will agree with you that Rich David is not the best role model and men like him at his age and at his stage in his career would have more going for himself Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted March 12, 2022 Report Share Posted March 12, 2022 7 hours ago, ginger said: Now that I think about it.. Has anyone thought to have Emily checked for lead poisoning? That building, the products she uses, she and her parents live in older homes... It sounds like a good idea to have this checked. It can be treated. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/lead-poisoning/diagnosis-treatment/drc-20354723 Certain jobs and industries are more likely to come in contact with lead. These jobs have been known to put workers at risk of lead exposure: Artists (materials used may contain lead) https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/lead/jobs.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginger Posted March 12, 2022 Report Share Posted March 12, 2022 2 hours ago, thomas said: It sounds like a good idea to have this checked. It can be treated. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/lead-poisoning/diagnosis-treatment/drc-20354723 Certain jobs and industries are more likely to come in contact with lead. These jobs have been known to put workers at risk of lead exposure: Artists (materials used may contain lead) https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/lead/jobs.html Good info, thank you. Who knew post menopausal women could have symptoms related to lead exposures over the years? Especially artists? Not me! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solak Supporter Posted March 12, 2022 Report Share Posted March 12, 2022 2 hours ago, Bingking said: The news channel 34 article stated she didn’t have a contract in place when she completed the walk so that may very well be the reason why she wasn't employed with them. A federal court would not decide whether any sex between rich and Emily was consensual or not regardless of if she was employed or not as it has been noted on BCVoice that there is evidence proof through her own admissions online that the sex was consensual and I believe Queenb or fact checker mentioned the screen shots of those posts were saved.. Her claims are not filed in NYS court because she does not have an actual lawsuit filed in court and there is a very slim chance any federal prosecutor would take Miss. Jablon serious based on her history of Bs and every day she posts something it tends to come to light let’s just say not in her favor. Federal prosecutors handle federal crimes. Title VII claims are civil. The first requirement to bring the Title VII claim is to exhaust administrative remedies by going to a state human rights agency or the EEOC. Even if the administrative agency finds no probable cause, the complainant gets a right to sue letter, and gets to then take their shot in federal court. A Title VII plaintiff’s gender employment discrimination/sexual harassment/ hostile work environment claim is not automatically barred by consensual sex. Nor is it barred by the absence of a written contract, which is not the sole indicator of an employment relationship, despite what the legal experts at Newschannel 34 imply. If the Title VII claim is pled in proper form, the defendant is subject to paper disclosure, and being questioned under oath in depositions. After that process, unless defendant shows there are no facts for a jury to determine, and gets the case dismissed as a matter of law, the case goes to trial. That Columbus Park project could end up a serious problem for our future senator, even if there was no written contract, and even if the sex was consensual. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bingking Posted March 12, 2022 Report Share Posted March 12, 2022 8 hours ago, Solak Supporter said: Federal prosecutors handle federal crimes. Title VII claims are civil. The first requirement to bring the Title VII claim is to exhaust administrative remedies by going to a state human rights agency or the EEOC. Even if the administrative agency finds no probable cause, the complainant gets a right to sue letter, and gets to then take their shot in federal court. A Title VII plaintiff’s gender employment discrimination/sexual harassment/ hostile work environment claim is not automatically barred by consensual sex. Nor is it barred by the absence of a written contract, which is not the sole indicator of an employment relationship, despite what the legal experts at Newschannel 34 imply. If the Title VII claim is pled in proper form, the defendant is subject to paper disclosure, and being questioned under oath in depositions. After that process, unless defendant shows there are no facts for a jury to determine, and gets the case dismissed as a matter of law, the case goes to trial. That Columbus Park project could end up a serious problem for our future senator, even if there was no written contract, and even if the sex was consensual. If Miss.Jablon had a claim it would of been brought infront of a judge by now, I understand you are revising all the verbiage and that’s great however Miss Jablon has been going on and on and on about how she has a claim in court and she has them charged with all these crimes however she doesn’t have any claim in court at the present moment.She even went as far as to say it has been elevated into Federal court and it has not done so. Her going back in fourth about how it is infront of a judge and then it is not really goes to lack of credibility. We have watched her go on and on about how she has a claim in court and her claiming she has them being sued and yet she files another video saying that she has to respond to their response and then it gets investigated and then it goes to court really shows how she doesn’t have anybody in court. All Miss . Jablon seems to be doing is claiming she has them charged in court when they’re are no charges pending so your claim that she has a valid option of Federal court claims would be a dream at this time. And yes a written contract would of had her paid whatever she is claiming she is entirely owed, that’s why we have written contracts in place because It provides the ultimate understanding of the agreement between the owners of a company or its investors, about the services rendered by a third party, or payment obligations. Columbus Park is no longer a problem due to no contract involved, if there was one it would of been a big advantage to file a lawsuit by now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solak Supporter Posted March 12, 2022 Report Share Posted March 12, 2022 50 minutes ago, Bingking said: If Miss.Jablon had a claim it would of been brought infront of a judge by now, I understand you are revising all the verbiage and that’s great however Miss Jablon has been going on and on and on about how she has a claim in court and she has them charged with all these crimes however she doesn’t have any claim in court at the present moment.She even went as far as to say it has been elevated into Federal court and it has not done so. Her going back in fourth about how it is infront of a judge and then it is not really goes to lack of credibility. We have watched her go on and on about how she has a claim in court and her claiming she has them being sued and yet she files another video saying that she has to respond to their response and then it gets investigated and then it goes to court really shows how she doesn’t have anybody in court. All Miss . Jablon seems to be doing is claiming she has them charged in court when they’re are no charges pending so your claim that she has a valid option of Federal court claims would be a dream at this time. And yes a written contract would of had her paid whatever she is claiming she is entirely owed, that’s why we have written contracts in place because It provides the ultimate understanding of the agreement between the owners of a company or its investors, about the services rendered by a third party, or payment obligations. Columbus Park is no longer a problem due to no contract involved, if there was one it would of been a big advantage to file a lawsuit by now. Title VII claims are not small claims cases. Exhausting administrative remedies as required can be a lengthy process. Columbus Park happened within the last 3 years. As long as the process of exhausting administrative remedies started within that time frame, Columbus Park could be a very serious problem for our future state senator, regardless of consensual sex and no written contract. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bingking Posted March 12, 2022 Report Share Posted March 12, 2022 41 minutes ago, Solak Supporter said: Title VII claims are not small claims cases. Exhausting administrative remedies as required can be a lengthy process. Columbus Park happened within the last 3 years. As long as the process of exhausting administrative remedies started within that time frame, Columbus Park could be a very serious problem for our future state senator, regardless of consensual sex and no written contract. Without a written contract it cannot be enforceable in a court , judge Seidel in her criminal court hearing has already said she is incapacitated and Miss. Jablon’s admitted it on her own Facebook page. She has continued to claim on Facebook she has a lawsuit in court and has all sorts of sexual charges on rich David when it reality there are no lawsuits filed in NYS court against rich David. Her own lawyer Ron B told her she has no proof when she was going to his house over the summer and that is from her own admissions when she posted on Facebook that he told her she has no proof after she showed him her documents . Based on all of this it is quite unrealistic she has any claim in court let alone federal court case. This is the same person who said she has a big priced attorney and then posted a text message she sent to her mom beggining for a public defender Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solak Supporter Posted March 12, 2022 Report Share Posted March 12, 2022 3 hours ago, Bingking said: Without a written contract it cannot be enforceable in a court , judge Seidel in her criminal court hearing has already said she is incapacitated and Miss. Jablon’s admitted it on her own Facebook page. She has continued to claim on Facebook she has a lawsuit in court and has all sorts of sexual charges on rich David when it reality there are no lawsuits filed in NYS court against rich David. Whoever has you convinced there is some ironclad legal maxim proclaiming that “ without a written contract it cannot be enforceable in court”, is badly mistaken. If that was so, there would be no Statute of Frauds, as has been the case in Anglo-American law since the 17th century, nor would the concept of quantum meruit exist, which may be even a little older than the Statute of Frauds. What is said in a city court criminal case does not necessarily dictate what is decided in a federal court civil case. As long as three years has.not expired since the event complained of, a Title VII complainant can start the process of exhausting administrative remedies, Facebook posts notwithstanding. So, our future senator faces potential exposure to a Title VII claim against him, and might have to defend it while a sitting senator. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bingking Posted March 12, 2022 Report Share Posted March 12, 2022 1 hour ago, Solak Supporter said: As long as three years has.not expired since the event complained of, a Title VII complainant can start the process of exhausting administrative remedies, Facebook posts notwithstanding. When you say that the person such as Emily would have to exhaust all administrative Remedies I it would mean actually taking the person to court by filing a lawsuit and when she loses the lawsuit she has to appeal the order and then when she loses the appeal that would be exhausting all remedies to then go to federal court. See the problem Mr. Solak is she continues to make the appearance on social media that the letters she sent to EEOC which is considered an inquiry she claims that “she pressed sexual charges and she has them in sexual-harassment course an invoice fraud court and payment refusal court “ when really there’s no such thing as a payment refusal court or an invoice fraud court and yes social media posts can be used in court just like she has been charged with felony charges in criminal court partly for her Facebook posts specifically one in detail where she asks the DA of whether it’s OK for her to shoot the mayor in the middle of the street so you’re wrong when you say Facebook posts not with standing. Another thing is that she says she has a retaliation charge well that’s also false because in order for retaliation charge to be used a lawsuit would have to be filed in court against that person, therefore this person cannot retaliate given that there is no lawsuit in place to retaliate for. It’s pretty sad that there’s people around her that continues to Gas her up thinking she has some sort of merit for click bait online. Please let us know here on BC voice when we can expect to see that lawsuit regarding Columbus Park Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solak Supporter Posted March 13, 2022 Report Share Posted March 13, 2022 3 hours ago, Bingking said: When you say that the person such as Emily would have to exhaust all administrative Remedies I it would mean actually taking the person to court by filing a lawsuit and when she loses the lawsuit she has to appeal the order and then when she loses the appeal that would be exhausting all remedies to then go to federal court. See the problem Mr. Solak is she continues to make the appearance on social media that the letters she sent to EEOC which is considered an inquiry she claims that “she pressed sexual charges and she has them in sexual-harassment course an invoice fraud court and payment refusal court “ when really there’s no such thing as a payment refusal court or an invoice fraud court and yes social media posts can be used in court just like she has been charged with felony charges in criminal court partly for her Facebook posts specifically one in detail where she asks the DA of whether it’s OK for her to shoot the mayor in the middle of the street so you’re wrong when you say Facebook posts not with standing. Another thing is that she says she has a retaliation charge well that’s also false because in order for retaliation charge to be used a lawsuit would have to be filed in court against that person, therefore this person cannot retaliate given that there is no lawsuit in place to retaliate for. It’s pretty sad that there’s people around her that continues to Gas her up thinking she has some sort of merit for click bait online. Please let us know here on BC voice when we can expect to see that lawsuit regarding Columbus Park Exhausting administrative remedies is not taking someone to court. It is what must happen before a Title VII claimant can sue in federal court. As long as that process begins before the expiration of three years from the event complained about, it is tmely. So measure three years forward from the Columbus Park project, and any time within that period the process could begin, if it has not done so already. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bingking Posted March 13, 2022 Report Share Posted March 13, 2022 1 hour ago, Solak Supporter said: Exhausting administrative remedies is not taking someone to court. It is what must happen before a Title VII claimant can sue in federal court. As long as that process begins before the expiration of three years from the event complained about, it is tmely. So measure three years forward from the Columbus Park project, and any time within that period the process could begin, if it has not done so already. Great info Sir but Unfortunately Emily did not work for them, atleast that’s what she said online when she got their response so that removes a majority of what you are claiming with Title VII. A lot of talk here but zero action coming from your camp. We can talk about the process all day long but in reality the problem is she has caught her self in many different stories that don’t add up. For instance she posted on BCVoice where she said she has never been in trouble before and fact checker here has mentioned two separate occasions proving otherwise. Like I said let us know on BCVoice when there is an actual lawsuit filed whether it’s with Columbus park or sexual charges on whoever she is going after . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solak Supporter Posted March 13, 2022 Report Share Posted March 13, 2022 37 minutes ago, Bingking said: Great info Sir but Unfortunately Emily did not work for them, atleast that’s what she said online when she got their response so that removes a majority of what you are claiming with Title VII. A lot of talk here but zero action coming from your camp. We can talk about the process all day long but in reality the problem is she has caught her self in many different stories that don’t add up. For instance she posted on BCVoice where she said she has never been in trouble before and fact checker here has mentioned two separate occasions proving otherwise. Like I said let us know on BCVoice when there is an actual lawsuit filed whether it’s with Columbus park or sexual charges on whoever she is going after . The work performed on Columbus Park can be seen by driving by. Measure forward three years from the time the work was done, and that is the time frame in which the Title VII claim could be commenced. So, our future senator may yet face such a claim, and may have to defend it as a sitting senator. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bingking Posted March 13, 2022 Report Share Posted March 13, 2022 9 minutes ago, Solak Supporter said: Measure forward three years from the time the work was done, and that is the time frame in which the Title VII claim could be commenced. Shoulda woulda coulda is all I hear from team Jablon and team Solak and it’s funny how She just posted on Facebook a response about Columbus park similar to what you have been posting tonight, team work! I find it interesting this paragraph off her most recent post tonight : “go Fuvk urself. I ain’t working with u if I can’t get a contract that states I’m going to get paid. Wtf is wrong with u? Everyone gets a contract?” Cause I never wanted to work with these douchebags and I was right. funny how she said she wasn't going to work with them unless a contract states she was going to get paid but she went through it anyways and finished Columbus park without a contract. Don’t take it from me take a look below at what a local news outlet called news Chanel 34 had to say: “However, COVID interrupted the process before a contract was signed, yet Jablon went ahead and finished it anyway. According to David, when the county did not pay Jablon the full amount she felt she was due, she tried to extort the money from him and the city.” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.