F. Lee Bailey Posted October 3, 2014 Report Share Posted October 3, 2014 Don't forget Binghamton voters, it was Judge Daniel Seiden who in 2009 sent 70-year-old Sue Monico to jail because her family couldn't afford the siding repairs on their Clinton Street bar. Is jail time really a fair sentence for an elderly woman over a very minor code violation? The City of Binghamton is full of code violations, dozens of violations on every street. But Judge Seiden, in his infinite wisdom, sent poor Sue Monico to jail. Judge Seiden was aware that her family was going through some personal problems and the business was declining, yet he still sent the 70-year-old to jail because she couldn't afford $20,000 for new siding. Now Judge Daniel Seiden wants to be re-elected...He doesn't have my vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted October 3, 2014 Report Share Posted October 3, 2014 I forgot about this one. That was pretty outrageous. There's many drug dealers who never see a day in jail, yet this old woman gets thrown behind bars? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justice Posted October 3, 2014 Report Share Posted October 3, 2014 I have to say until I was reminded of the Sue Monico case I was voting for Seiden. This would be the same guy seen hugging Tony Fiala who was issued an appearance ticket. I know Seiden had nothing to do with the appearance ticket but it certainly shows that who you are really matters in the Criminal Justice System in Binghamton. I can honestly say a vote for Mike Baker is a vote for a man that will treat everyone the same and as a human being. Probably one of the nicest guys I have ever had the pleasure of meeting he will be fair to all and not base it on a last name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubbaGump Posted October 3, 2014 Report Share Posted October 3, 2014 Never heard of mike baker,doesn't know where he's from or what schools he went to but if thse are the choices I wouldn't vote for Seiden. I think he does what he's told not what is right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie Five-O Posted October 3, 2014 Report Share Posted October 3, 2014 Seiden doesn't have my support. What an asinine ruling, throwing a 70 year old in jail for siding! UNBELIEVABLE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJC Posted October 4, 2014 Report Share Posted October 4, 2014 That story outraged me. He doesn't have the proper reasoning to be a judge. I'm surprised that story didn't make national headlines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
27 Time World Champions Posted October 4, 2014 Report Share Posted October 4, 2014 Great job F. Lee Bailey for reminding everybody about this. Of course I remember this incident, but filed it in the back of my brain and needed this wake up call. Attention spans just keep getting shorter and shorter these days... Mike Baker needs to go to town with this one. Just one slickly produced commercial wins him the election. Think George HW Bush and his attack ad. This and Dukakis in that tank pretty much won him the 1988 Presidential election Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Man Posted October 4, 2014 Report Share Posted October 4, 2014 Judge Daniel Seiden: 70-year-old woman gets jail time for code violation! Tony Fiala gets a hug! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uncle Festus Posted October 4, 2014 Report Share Posted October 4, 2014 Don't forget Binghamton voters, it was Judge Daniel Seiden who in 2009 sent 70-year-old Sue Monico to jail because her family couldn't afford the siding repairs on their Clinton Street bar. Is jail time really a fair sentence for an elderly woman over a very minor code violation? The City of Binghamton is full of code violations, dozens of violations on every street. But Judge Seiden, in his infinite wisdom, sent poor Sue Monico to jail. Judge Seiden was aware that her family was going through some personal problems and the business was declining, yet he still sent the 70-year-old to jail because she couldn't afford $20,000 for new siding. Now Judge Daniel Seiden wants to be re-elected...He doesn't have my vote. I don't remember this case at all. After reading these comments, I don't think I have enough of the facts of the case, to be able to judge the reasonableness, or UNreasonableness of the judges actions. Is the fact that the lady was 70 years old really pertinent? I'm sure there are many 70 year olds who are capable of defying the law for no good reason except that they want to. What I'm trying to say is that there is nothing wrong with their minds, and they are perfectly capable of understanding what they are supposed to do. (like get the outside of their building brought up to standards, for instance). If she couldn't afford to repair the place, couldn't she then just lock the door and walk away from the place? That is abandon it? It appears that many, many people do that all the time here in Binghamton. I think there are many buildings here in Binghamton that have not been used in years, and appear to be abandoned. I just fail to see what her age should have to do with anything. Please fill me in on any pertinent facts of the case that I'm not aware of. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WolfMan Posted October 4, 2014 Report Share Posted October 4, 2014 I don't remember this case at all {snip} Please fill me in on any pertinent facts of the case that I'm not aware of. Thanks! . Me neither, so I Googled. These too are not the full story, but here are two WBNG reports http://www.wbng.com/closings/52217572.html http://www.wbng.com/closings/52123687.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2pelo Honey Posted October 4, 2014 Report Share Posted October 4, 2014 The Judge was campaigning a few days ago, and I brought this sit up, and was told she'd had 14 court appearances...for whatever that's worth. What I don't know is was she actively targeted by CE for some reason? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubbaGump Posted October 4, 2014 Report Share Posted October 4, 2014 In order to see the complaint against Mrs. Monaco you would need to stop your car in front of the Union hotel and go accross the street and look up at the building. It wasn't that bad to look at yet she was charged /fined and jailed. There are hundreds of properties in far worse shape than that one was and still are. Ryan told the judge what he wanted and got his way, is that the kind of justice you want in the city courts? Works well with the DA doesn't it? He proved what he is guess Baker IS the best choice, you can vote him out the next election if he doesn't practice justice for all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
relic Posted October 5, 2014 Report Share Posted October 5, 2014 I don't remember this case at all. After reading these comments, I don't think I have enough of the facts of the case, to be able to judge the reasonableness, or UNreasonableness of the judges actions. Is the fact that the lady was 70 years old really pertinent? I'm sure there are many 70 year olds who are capable of defying the law for no good reason except that they want to. What I'm trying to say is that there is nothing wrong with their minds, and they are perfectly capable of understanding what they are supposed to do. (like get the outside of their building brought up to standards, for instance). If she couldn't afford to repair the place, couldn't she then just lock the door and walk away from the place? That is abandon it? It appears that many, many people do that all the time here in Binghamton. I think there are many buildings here in Binghamton that have not been used in years, and appear to be abandoned. I just fail to see what her age should have to do with anything. Please fill me in on any pertinent facts of the case that I'm not aware of. Thanks! Here's a pertinent fact that you are obviously unaware of....If you think that since she could not afford to fix the siding on the building she should then abandon it, then you have some major comprehension issues. Ask Vanna to buy a vowel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vito Posted October 6, 2014 Report Share Posted October 6, 2014 What is Bakers current occupation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubbaGump Posted October 6, 2014 Report Share Posted October 6, 2014 Vito that remains a secret, assuming a lawyer. Rob Kilmer would be a better choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginger Posted October 6, 2014 Report Share Posted October 6, 2014 Senior assistant public defender. He has a FB page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubbaGump Posted October 7, 2014 Report Share Posted October 7, 2014 Oh goody A Matt Ryan cronie! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubbaGump Posted October 14, 2014 Report Share Posted October 14, 2014 Let's go back to the Matt Ryan quote to WBNG,where he said that " It has been at least two years" well there has been many properties especially owned by the Kradjean family that fall under Mattys words and those were right on Main Street. Furthermore Ryan had the balls to tip a few at the unions fund raiser a few days after the fact. Selective enforcement at its best! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Independent Posted October 14, 2014 Report Share Posted October 14, 2014 I want all to know Mike Baker is the choice from us here at BCV for City Court Judge! The man is down to earth and came to me sat down with me and talked about why he's running with NO ARROGANCE ABOUT HIM. I like what he had to say and i like the man. He deserves a chance to prove himself. So my support goes out to Mike Baker. He's struck me to be a fair person and will get my vote! As will others running, We here at BCV will be giving our assessments for all to formulate your own opinions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PARMELEE Posted October 18, 2014 Report Share Posted October 18, 2014 Mike Baker is the right choice...I wish he'd get his name out there more so people will know him...Absolutely the best man for the job.... For once let's start to get rid of the "Good Ol Boys" hold on the area... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uncle buck Posted October 21, 2014 Report Share Posted October 21, 2014 Did you ever watch his performance in City Court.......arrogant and a loud mouth! Bad news! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guest11 Posted October 29, 2014 Report Share Posted October 29, 2014 Seiden is spending a fortune on TV ads, he must be scared! Time to get rid of Seiden. Vote for Mike Baker! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubbaGump Posted October 30, 2014 Report Share Posted October 30, 2014 Dump the Chump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteMoss Posted October 30, 2014 Report Share Posted October 30, 2014 Great job F. Lee Bailey for reminding everybody about this. Of course I remember this incident, but filed it in the back of my brain and needed this wake up call. Attention spans just keep getting shorter and shorter these days... Mike Baker needs to go to town with this one. Just one slickly produced commercial wins him the election. Think George HW Bush and his attack ad. This and Dukakis in that tank pretty much won him the 1988 Presidential election A little history about Willie Horton. Al Gore first mentioned the weekend furlough program during the 88 dem primary. Al didn't win that one. Also, this wasn't a George Bush sponsored add. It was done by another group. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.